gimme, gimme, gimme; sounds like my snail mailbox : gimme, gimme, gimme. #1 was by a brazilian physicist who did the mass-spec test on the samples. You have to get off your dead **** and go LOOK for that report. #2 was a report in mufon in re to microscopic studies of tissue samples from mutilated cattle, go LOOK.
#3 : all you have to do is thumb through back issues of Popular Science magazine to find "memory metal", IF that isn't too much trouble.
Thanks timer.
Continued prayers for Mom.
No offense, but that is a typical response from a conspiracy theorist. When asked for tangible evidence of their theories they refer to anecdotal reports on evidence that apparently no longer exist, and then tell anyone who asks to see the reports to find them themselves. You've introduced the "evidence" to the discussion. YOU should be able to direct others to the same information so they can draw their own conclusions.
You still offer zero proof, just that he was Brazilian, big whoop.
You made the outrageous claim, you are responsible for proving it, not me, my job is not to provide the proof.
A report in mufon about mutilated cattle? So what? You have offered zero evidence.
Memory metal, great, I know the story, where is evidence and proof? Just a 50 year old story, nothing proved. Popular Science is a great magazine, show me the story.
When you offer up a story, it is your responsibility to offer up the proof. You only have sensationalism and words.