To: pitinkie
Of course he did. He was the Attorney General. Can you fire a U.S. Attorney without the Attorney General passing on it? ABC is a bunch of idiots, or they think that the public is a bunch of idiots.
2 posted on
03/23/2007 6:47:39 PM PDT by
popdonnelly
(Our first responsibility is to keep the power of the Presidency out of the hands of the Clintons.)
To: popdonnelly
I would assume that hiring and firing would be part of his job description.
8 posted on
03/23/2007 6:51:23 PM PDT by
doc1019
(Fred Thompson '08)
To: popdonnelly
"...or they think that the public is a bunch of idiots."
In that regard, they would be largely correct.
11 posted on
03/23/2007 7:00:06 PM PDT by
Roccus
(Whiskey for my men, beer for my horses.)
To: popdonnelly
...they think that the public is a bunch of idiots
They think that the public is a bunch of idiots.
The democrats count on it.
That's how they know they can get elected into power and how they know they can get away with so much of their bovine excrement.
18 posted on
03/23/2007 7:13:40 PM PDT by
adorno
To: popdonnelly
I think certainly the latter, and possibly the former (ok, they are idiots, but I think they understand that this is a non-story).
susie
27 posted on
03/23/2007 7:51:23 PM PDT by
brytlea
(amnesty--an act of clemency by an authority by which pardon is granted esp. to a group of individual)
To: popdonnelly
or they think that the public is a bunch of idiots.No, they know that the public is a bunch of idiots. Uncritical, underinformed and undereducated nonthinking slugs.
28 posted on
03/23/2007 7:58:06 PM PDT by
RJS1950
(The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
To: popdonnelly
Actually, they know that half of all Americans are idiots.
32 posted on
03/23/2007 8:28:08 PM PDT by
Eagles6
(Dig deeper, more ammo.)
To: popdonnelly
Of course he did.But he said last week, if the article can be trusted, that he "was not involved in any discussions about what was going on." Now perhaps he simply didn't recall this meeting, but I bet otherwise.
36 posted on
03/23/2007 8:50:56 PM PDT by
edsheppa
To: popdonnelly
Ya know, I just don't get why Gonzales or Bush or anyone minces around the truth. Dear God, just say, "Yeah, we fired 'em! Yes, I was involved, they were incompetent. Why do you ask?" Instead, it's "Ooooo, no, oh willikers, no, I didn't do it, well maybe I saw a little something but it was a post it or something, and gosh golly no I would never..."
Half-truths, stammering around, and apologizing are sure-fire ways to invite the Dims with gold lettering to stick the shiv in. Can we surprised when they do?
41 posted on
03/23/2007 10:21:13 PM PDT by
VictoryGal
(Never give up, never surrender!)
To: popdonnelly; pitinkie
Can you imagineif the documents showed otherwise?? "Documents Show Gonzalez Disapproved of Firings"...the LameStream Media outlet ABC would have their panties in a knot about Gonzales
not having control of his own JD!!
LOL...really, the whole thing makes me laugh. The LSMers will make it a scandal either way!!!
45 posted on
03/24/2007 3:46:56 AM PDT by
Recovering_Democrat
(I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!)
To: popdonnelly
The public is a bunch of idiots... at least 50% are anyway...
It this kinda crap that pisses me off about this Admin...
Bush should just come out and put it in simple terms to the people and press....
Bush: "It's MY damn right to fire US attorney's, End of Story!",
but no... they just let this crap fester and fester....
53 posted on
03/24/2007 6:56:14 AM PDT by
fhlh
(Liberal (noun): A person so open minded, their brains have fallen out of their head.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson