To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Well, first things first. There are four children of this union. Are any of them having genetic abnormalities, like compromised immune systems, for example? This ought to be the first concern, with their parents a very distant second.
2 posted on
03/23/2007 5:41:41 PM PDT by
GSlob
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
After incest, the right to procreate with your pet will be next!
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Cultural decline sets in when the government
protects behaviors from individual moral consequences. The issue is not about telling consenting adults, at gunpoint, what they can and cannot do in the bedroom. The issue is forcing others, at gunpoint, to condone these actions by making it illegal for them to pronounce verdicts dictated by their own values (by firing, evicting, refusing service to, rejecting from social groups/neighborhood associations, or not considering for employment individuals they find to be acting in a morally bankrupt manner).
In short, it should not be illegal for me to impose my own values upon another in response to any of their actions. As it stands today, we are forced to condone all manner of revolting behavior or be in violation of the law - oh, and not just condone it, but actively SUBSIDIZE depravity by picking up the tab for the negative consequences. Both mechanisms that act to squash individual moral choice need to be extinguished.
7 posted on
03/23/2007 5:51:09 PM PDT by
M203M4
(Ignorance of basic math underlies economic ignorance and helps fuel socialism.)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
I'm a libertarian so I believe people have the right to do what they want as long as it does not interfere with our freedoms.
However, they should not be allowed to have children together, and the sister should had her tubes tied. If they wanted to have kids, then they should adopt.
15 posted on
03/23/2007 6:04:15 PM PDT by
MinorityRepublican
(Everyone that doesn't like what America and President Bush has done for Iraq can all go to HELL)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Ironic that liberals will say that morality shouldn't intrude into a social issue, yet they fail to see, that the lack of morality leads to increased social costs.
In this case, the possibility of subsidized health care should the couples offspring have serious health problems.
How about this, I'll agree to let people do what they want, as long as they agree to leave the taxpayers alone when they have to deal with the consequences of their actions.
17 posted on
03/23/2007 6:07:44 PM PDT by
Sergio
(If a tree fell on a mime in the forest, would he make a sound?)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Jerry Springer Law.. Anyone Anytime Anywhere for any reason...
20 posted on
03/23/2007 6:21:24 PM PDT by
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Walk down any urban street in America and ask the kids who their father is -- ask them if they know who their brothers or sisters are. The next generation has absolutely no idea in many cases if the partner in bed with them is a close relation.
27 posted on
03/23/2007 7:05:03 PM PDT by
devane617
(Let's take back our country -- get a job in the MSM, or education system. We need you.)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
In Lawrence v. Texas, the Supreme Court found that "consenting" adults had a right to privacy when it comes to sexual relations--any kind of sexual relations. At the time, the elites had a good laugh at the idea that the state could have a compelling interest in what people do in their bedrooms. I would direct them to this column.
31 posted on
03/23/2007 7:18:47 PM PDT by
denydenydeny
("We have always been, we are, and I hope that we always shall be detested in France"--Wellington)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Okay, I think I need to barf.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson