Maybe because there is no "anti-Rudy" faction?
There are groupS of individuals who feel that other, truly conservative candidates offer a better choice.
Personally, I don't care about his marriages.
His record on conservative issues is much worse than his divorce record.
There is the "STOP RUDY" ping list. I'll go way out on a limb and say that those folks have defined themselves as anti-Rudy.
There are groupS of individuals who feel that other, truly conservative candidates offer a better choice.
Those folks I would classify as pro-Thompson or pro-Romney or pro-McCain, etc.
Question is whether people are more defined by their support of a candidate or their opposition to a candidate and how reasonable are the arguments pro and con. IMHO it's a more positive message to be seen as a supporter than as a mere naysayer. "STOP RUDY" isn't an option on a ballot.