Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Longinus
Naval vessels are obsolete - or so champions of cruise missiles would have us think.

Time to find out if our Navy can survive an onslaught of sunburns and silkworms fired at a short distance in narrow straights or if the Iranians can survive a stealth fighter attack along their batteries on the shore.

Time too to find out how well the shore-based launchers survive overflights by Hellfire-equipped MQ-1 Predators...and MQ-9 Reapers, [which the Navy gives folding wings and a tailhook, and then refers to as Mariners] which can also carry Stingers and JDAMs.
Plus the Marine attack helicopters aboard the carriers and support ships, once the stealth aircraft *blind* the Iranian air defence radars.

The Air Force has concluded new pilot training for the F-117 and was planning to retire the Nighthawk by 2008. But perhaps not quite yet, and it may yet retire with one more combat ribbon to its credit.

181 posted on 03/23/2007 9:39:56 AM PDT by archy (Et Thybrim multo spumantem sanguine cerno. [from Virgil's *Aeneid*.])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]


To: archy
The loss of the F-117 to Serbian SAMs - they gave crashed fighter to the Russians - is the reason it wen obsolete - it is also a slow jet in comparison.

I am sure it is high tech enough for the Iranians - with that said I am not so gung ho to be a fan of what the defense contractors claims our weapons can do.

I am one of those conservatives that views the Military Industrial Complex as something to be weary about.

217 posted on 03/23/2007 1:17:50 PM PDT by Longinus ("Whom did it benefit". (Cui Bono Fuerit) Longinus Cassius Roman conspirator & general (? - 42 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson