Posted on 03/23/2007 12:29:59 AM PDT by neverdem
Questions remain.
Representative Brad Miller (D-NC) is seeking answers about Purdue's investigation.
By Robert F. Service
ScienceNOW Daily News
22 March 2007
A Congressional subcommittee has stoked the flames under the cauldron of controversy that is bubble fusion. Those flames all but died out last month after an internal investigation at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana, absolved nuclear engineer Rusi Taleyarkhan of any scientific misconduct surrounding his research on producing nuclear fusion in collapsing bubbles (ScienceNOW, 7 February). But yesterday, Representative Brad Miller (D-NC), who heads the Investigations and Oversight Subcommittee of the House Committee on Science and Technology sent a letter to Purdue's President Martin Jischke requesting a copy of the university's internal reports on their inquiry.
Miller says he'd like to know whether or not to believe Taleyarkhan's controversial claims that he's seen evidence for fusion in collapsing bubbles. But he's more interested in Purdue's investigation. "I think it's more of a concern about the procedures at Purdue to make sure they are assuring ethical conduct in research," Miller says. He adds that because the federal government spends billions of dollars on research at universities each year, it's essential that Congress ensure that misconduct investigations operate as intended.
Miller says it's not clear that happened in this case. "Despite the University's statement that no misconduct had occurred, many disturbing questions remain about the scope and adequacy of the investigation," says Miller's letter to Jischke. Among those questions: Why Purdue officials seem to have stopped one investigation in September only to launch another, and whether they looked into the full array of complaints against Taleyarkhan, including an alleged manipulation of scientific data.
In the past, Purdue officials have declined to make reports of their investigation public in order to comply with university rules on confidentiality. But in a statement issued late today, Purdue officials said they plan to comply with the committee’s request. Just what will happen after that depends on what the reports show, says Miller. But chances are the bubble fusion controversy will keep boiling for months to come.
Related sites
Food fight: Cheese bacteria fight off viral attacks
Astronomers Explode a Virtual Star
Geology Picture of the Week Bonus: Ice Tower on Mount Erebus
FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.
It's all about tearing down Purdue, bring it down to most other colleges level. Which is stink.
My opinion is that the congressman has gotten his marching orders from either the hot fusion crowd or enemies of Taleyharkin in his area of research (he has several in the fiels of cold fusion research). Frankly I don't know if there is anything to his research but it looks like it is being halted by accusations and investigations.
Why is it the federal government's job to make sure a university appropriately investigated a citizen who reported on research?
I suppose because the government gave them money for research -- but that begs the question, why is it the federal government's right to take my money and give it to a university for research?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1800912/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=prius
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=coldfusion
New Evidence Supports Claim of Bubble Fusion (It's baaaack)
New Energy Times | Sep 10, '06 | Steven Krivit
Posted on 09/12/2006 4:05:40 PM EDT by saganite
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1700210/posts
"Eugenie Samuel Reich published a series of four articles in Nature which came as close as possible to accusing Purdue physicist Rusi Taleyarkhan of committing fraud without actually saying so... Reich's series of four stories in Nature was replete with innuendo and groundless speculation, building a house of cards on which to base the thesis that her journalistic investigation would lead to 'the end of bubble fusion.' The core of the Reich/Nature allegation was based on speculations made by physicist Seth Putterman and his associate Brian Naranjo at UCLA that an on-hand source of Californium-252 was responsible for the novel results claimed by Taleyarkhan... Taleyarkhan is far too experienced a scientist to make such a careless mistake: allowing contamination from on-hand source of Californium-252 to interfere with the results. The very clear implication was that Taleyarkhan had spiked his experiment intentionally."
Whoops.
Thanks for the links, especially the the info on the Prius.
The movie is CHAIN REACTION. Obviously big oil/vested interests yanking on the Perdue chain. Sonofusion predates Taleyharkin and the ITER crowd is trying to smother the whole field of LENR in the cradle, although it's 18 years old now. Once it was blimps vs fixed wing planes, now it's CTNF vs LENR. History goes in cycles, yes?
Heh... I zigged when I should have zagged, and plastered that into the wrong "posting comment" window.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.