"...He further stated that two DVD’s were submitted to the court, but he was unsure if the Judge had time to watch them, but that on national TV, on the Neil Cavuto Show, in front of 20 million viewers, Jim Gilchrist wrapped his arm around Marvin Stewart, and stated, “Here is Marvin Stewart, an African American, and esteemed member of my Board of Directors, and he will be taking the lead against Columbia University whose students disrupted our speech on October 4”. Judge Wilkinson replied that Mr. Lacy himself better watch the videos, because it was on Martha Macallum’s Show that Gilchrist stated this in front of 20 million viewers, and everyone laughed, but everyone understood the Judge had indeed viewed and reviewed the videos, and that Gilchrist did indeed say what was quoted...."
There had to be some reason for the Judge to NOT turn it all back to Gilchrist. If the above is on video Gilchrist can't deny it.
Not good. But again, the Corporate and By-law documents should be the determining factor. It's starting to look like Gilchrist "screwed the pooch", and a CPA at that.