Skip to comments.
Editor at L.A. Times quits over film producer flap
Reuters and Los Angeles Times ^
| March 22, 2007
| Dan Whitcomb
Posted on 03/22/2007 7:44:27 PM PDT by bd476
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
1
posted on
03/22/2007 7:44:28 PM PDT
by
bd476
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; BurbankKarl; Brad's Gramma; lainie; NormsRevenge; A CA Guy
2
posted on
03/22/2007 7:45:45 PM PDT
by
bd476
To: bd476
3
posted on
03/22/2007 7:50:21 PM PDT
by
mdittmar
(May God watch over those who serve,and have served, to keep us free.)
To: bd476
he was canceling publication of the section to avoid any appearance of a conflict.This is one of the DNC's house organs. Since when are they worried about "conflicts"?
4
posted on
03/22/2007 7:56:24 PM PDT
by
hsalaw
To: bd476
"But I will not be lectured on ethics by some ostensibly objective news reporters and editors who lobby for editorials to be written on certain subjects or who have suggested that our editorial page coordinate more closely with the newsroom's agenda ..."Imagine that... Who wudda thunk that the LA Times newsroom would have an agenda... They've been telling us all along that they just report the news (heh heh)... I'm so shocked that I'm beside myself...
I don't really need a sarcasm disclaimer, do I?
5
posted on
03/22/2007 7:57:03 PM PDT
by
Zeppo
(We live in the Age of Stupidity. [Dennis Prager])
To: mdittmar
mdittmar wrote: "That's a shame."
Yes. Isn't it. /tongue-in-cheek
6
posted on
03/22/2007 8:01:40 PM PDT
by
bd476
To: hsalaw
hsalaw wrote: "
'he was canceling publication of the section to avoid any appearance of a conflict.'
This is one of the DNC's house organs. Since when are they worried about 'conflicts'?
Excellent question. I'd guess only when the DNC instructs them to worry.
7
posted on
03/22/2007 8:03:51 PM PDT
by
bd476
To: Zeppo
Zeppo wrote: "Imagine that... Who wudda thunk that the LA Times newsroom would have an agenda... They've been telling us all along that they just report the news (heh heh)... I'm so shocked that I'm beside myself...
I don't really need a sarcasm disclaimer, do I?"
ROFL! No, a disclaimer isn't necessary. You were as clear as a bell. :-)
8
posted on
03/22/2007 8:06:52 PM PDT
by
bd476
To: bd476
"....or who have suggested that our editorial page coordinate more closely with the newsroom's agenda ..."Well! I am shocked, SHOCKED, that a Democrat newspaper like the LA Times would coordinate its editorials with "the newsroom's agenda".
To: bd476
How come Rats are involved in flaps and repubs are involved in scandals ?
10
posted on
03/22/2007 8:18:18 PM PDT
by
stylin19a
(If you are living on the edge...MOVE OVER ! Some of us are ready to jump !)
To: bd476
To: stylin19a
Rats - flap Pubs - scandal. Rats have a first class war machine. Search and destroy dept. operates like a Marine tactical force compared to the feckless rinos. They have had almost 8 years to perfect their squad , unimpeded by the the ladies in th WH .
12
posted on
03/22/2007 8:54:47 PM PDT
by
fantom
To: fantom
Oh well. Remember that jerkass editor who said that all Vietnam Veterans should go to Iraq? Paul Whitehead, LA Times. Let them go the way of the dinosaurs.
To: bd476
The same rag of a paper that gave us "Barack the Magic Negro".
14
posted on
03/22/2007 10:24:35 PM PDT
by
Mark
(REMEMBER: Mean spirited, angry remarks against my postings won't feed even one hungry child.)
To: bd476
Bunch of queens having hissy fits....
15
posted on
03/22/2007 10:28:21 PM PDT
by
La Enchiladita
(Hunter/Poe 2008 "Once again, our government is on the wrong side of the border war")
To: La Enchiladita
16
posted on
03/22/2007 10:47:49 PM PDT
by
bd476
To: La Enchiladita
The NYT bathhouse boys must be snickering!
To: stylin19a
stylin19a wrote: "How come Rats are involved in flaps and repubs are involved in scandals ?"
Indeed.
18
posted on
03/22/2007 11:02:05 PM PDT
by
bd476
To: bd476
He also delivered a blistering rebuke to his critics in the newsroom and suggested that some of the paper's reporters and editors were guilty of their own ethical lapses. Does this mean that a couple of reporters actually voted for at least one Republican?
19
posted on
03/22/2007 11:11:55 PM PDT
by
RJL
To: bd476
Talk about Hollywood and the media being in bed together...
20
posted on
03/22/2007 11:12:50 PM PDT
by
WestVirginiaRebel
("...Mindless pack of trained Maoist circus seals."-www.iowahwk.typepad.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson