[Peach]

Just a few differences and then I need to head out:

If women were going to vote for Rudy because they want to abort their babies, as you seem to think, then they wouldn't vote for a man who has said he'd appoint strict constructionist judges. They'd vote for the sure bet which is Hillary or Obama.

And since fewer women are aborting their babies now than in the last 20 years, and since women voted for Bush twice, I think you're full of baloney.

[Beagle8U]

"If women were going to vote for Rudy because they want to abort their babies, as you seem to think, then they wouldn't vote for a man who has said he'd appoint strict constructionist judges. They'd vote for the sure bet which is Hillary or Obama."

Only problem....Rudy defines Ruth Buzzy Ginsburg as a perfect example of his definition of a strict constructionist.

Rudy appointed all liberal judges in the past, its a safe bet he will in the future. In fact he is the only one of those three with a known record of appointing liberal judges.