[pissant]

Hunter is as clean as a whistle, but the alleged wrongdoings will be sure to emerge, as will the fact that he has not been charged with squat over any of that. And I'll put up Hunters credibility any day of the week over what is or is not needed by the armed forces.

[traditional1]

"he has not been charged with squat over any of that"

I love it when people defend by saying "he has not been charged with any crime" or "there is no evidence of that"...

Reminds me of the ol' Klintoon years, where evidence suddenly disappeared, and political chits could be called in anytime to prevent prosecution 'cause someone else had something to hide, and didn't dare pursue prosecution.

I stand by my assertion: Hunter is un-electable, and would assure a Hildabeast White House in 2008.

[Gop1040]

"And I'll put up Hunters credibility any day of the week over what is or is not needed by the armed forces."

Some questions that I don't believe have been asked of Hunter yet concern the scandalous conditions that wounded soldiers have in the past, and continue to be subjected to at military health facilities in the US. Did he know about it? When did he know about it? And what did he do about it?

[airborne]

Hunter is as clean as a whistle, but the alleged wrongdoings will be sure to emerge, as will the fact that he has not been charged with squat over any of that.

I seem to recall it being on one of his old web sites. Hunter addressed the issue and also the check overdraft issue.

He was investigated in both cases and was not charged for anything.

His constituents reelected him by a wide margin.

There's not a single politician today in either party that's squeaky clean.

But Hunter appears to as remarkably clean as any candidate running for President in some time.