Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Fred Thompson's Campaign Finance Investigation Riles His Own Party (A blast from the past)
National Review ^ | April 7, 1997 | Rich Lowry

Posted on 03/22/2007 9:40:54 AM PDT by quidnunc

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-171 next last
To: quidnunc
Chances are that Thompson can't win the nomination. He's polling 6% in Ohio.

He's not a candidate yet. That's actually a pretty good number considering.

121 posted on 03/22/2007 1:24:58 PM PDT by jmc813 (The 2nd Amendment is NOT a "social conservative" issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Thanks for the ping...

Here's an mp3 of Fred with Laura Ingram:

http://www.fred08.com/images/INGRAM.mp3
122 posted on 03/22/2007 1:25:01 PM PDT by babygene (Never look into the laser with your last good eye...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
you win first, then as part of a winning coalition - you have influence to fight for the positions you want to see implemented.

If a liberal is elected president, whether Republican or Democrat, I have lost. The only way I have to "fight for the positions I want to see implemented" is by getting a person who agrees with those positions elected.

You obviously feel differently and you can see "victory" in a liberal president who will work against most of your positions, as long as the liberal has an "R" after their name.

This is the thrust of the pro-Rudy posters, I can except this. What I don't understand is why you are on FR. FR is a conservative forum, not a Republican forum. The ridiculous logical gymnastics that Rudy supporters use to try and convince FReepers that Rudy is really not a liberal are not only disingenuous but are tiring. Give it up. Spend your time campaigning for the liberal of your choice. Post on a liberal forum. Leave us conservatives to discuss how we will get a conservative into office.

123 posted on 03/22/2007 1:25:01 PM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
if Thompson is the nominee, the base has to allow him to tack to the center on some issues. If they don't, the media is going to be able to cast Thompson as "an actor who dabbled in politics, who now wants to run for president by embracing the religious right and hardcore conservatives to take down 'americas mayor'".

I hate to tell you this, but the media will do that no matter who is running or how far left they run.

Fred will be able to run from a pro-life, pro-gun and pro-conservative stance. He has far more charisma than anyone else in the race on either side. He can finesse a few moves to center - but he will be able to draw the Reagan Dems back to the GOP ledger by what he is now, not what he may say later.

124 posted on 03/22/2007 1:25:55 PM PDT by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: onyx
The people that are trashing him are the Rudy fans.

Allow me to amend this sentence too. The people that are trashing him are a small-minority of Rudy fans.

125 posted on 03/22/2007 1:26:19 PM PDT by jmc813 (The 2nd Amendment is NOT a "social conservative" issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

it's early.

But the point to be made there is - if he plans on getting in. GET IN NOW. This idea that he can wait it out, I understand his play there to let Rudy be bloodied before he enters. But with respect to the general election - Thompson needs as much exposure as he can get. Sure, he's on TV and radio. But people have to start thinking about him as a politician with the experience to be President, and it takes alot of time and money to develop an image and persona, especially when the entire weight of the media is against you.


126 posted on 03/22/2007 1:27:00 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Who are you trying to snow? The Guiliani supporters are completely transparent in their attempts to post negatively about Fred Thompson. His "possible" entrance has some of them worried sick. So what? They're so transparent that their posting theories of sheer lunacy. My favorite makes the claim that Fred is shilling for McCain -- trying to stop Guiliani's momentum --- LOL. Now ask yourself, how much sense does it make for Fred Thompson to enter a grueling campaign that will require him to spend months on the road away from his young family, all in the effort to help McCain? Voter support and delegates cannot be transferred like bank funds. No, dirtboy, it's not the Guiliani supporters who are spreading the hate and discontent. It's the same ole third party advocates and unappeasable purists. The folks that despise Mitt too, and some even think Hunter isn't good enough on the issues. I'll grant the Guliani supporters another thing --- scant few of them are threatening to stay home if someone else wins the nomination.
127 posted on 03/22/2007 1:27:39 PM PDT by onyx (DEFEAT Hillary Clinton, Marxist, student of Saul Alinsky & ally and beneficiary of Soros.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton

no you haven't. If Rudy were elected, and Ted Olson is sitting there banging away selecting federal judges - we're fine.


128 posted on 03/22/2007 1:28:44 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: onyx
No, dirtboy, it's not the Guiliani supporters who are spreading the hate and discontent.

Can you please point me to some threads where Thompson is getting attacked from the right? I genuinely want to go to them and defend him.

129 posted on 03/22/2007 1:31:06 PM PDT by jmc813 (The 2nd Amendment is NOT a "social conservative" issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

Considering who the so-called Republicans were that were in the Senate at the time, can this really be a bad thing?


130 posted on 03/22/2007 1:31:24 PM PDT by 1L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
and Ted Olson is sitting there banging away selecting federal judges

Hopefully he'll do a better job of selecting judges than he does selecting clients.

131 posted on 03/22/2007 1:31:47 PM PDT by jmc813 (The 2nd Amendment is NOT a "social conservative" issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

You forgot to ping Jim to tattle on me. I'm telling you, you are one of the worst tattle tales and trouble makers here. I'll never forget that you were the first one out of the box to jump on the "Bush is a cokehead" band wagon.


132 posted on 03/22/2007 1:32:03 PM PDT by onyx (DEFEAT Hillary Clinton, Marxist, student of Saul Alinsky & ally and beneficiary of Soros.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Who are you trying to snow? The Guiliani supporters are completely transparent in their attempts to post negatively about Fred Thompson. His "possible" entrance has some of them worried sick. So what? They're so transparent that their posting theories of sheer lunacy. My favorite makes the claim that Fred is shilling for McCain -- trying to stop Guiliani's momentum --- LOL. Now ask yourself, how much sense does it make for Fred Thompson to enter a grueling campaign that will require him to spend months on the road away from his young family, all in the effort to help McCain? Voter support and delegates cannot be transferred like bank funds. No, dirtboy, it's not the Guiliani supporters who are spreading the hate and discontent.

So having just said how the Rudy boosters are trying to sandbag Fred, you claim they are NOT spreading the hate and discontent, because they are so bad at it? Sheez....some of these same folks were the ones spreading outright lies and misconceptions about Hunter, who is a damn good man whether or not you think he can win.

What makes you think they won't do the same to Fred? If anything, the Rudy camp is consistent with their depravity. They will find molehills and make mountains of them. And create new molehills if actual ones are in short supply.

It's the same ole third party advocates and unappeasable purists. The folks that despise Mitt too, and some even think Hunter isn't good enough on the issues.

Those folks are a small minority. Most, however, see Rudy's potential nomination as a train wreck waiting to happen - on many levels. And their concerns are well-justified. And most would find common ground with Fred that they simply would be unable to find with someone as far left as Rudy.

I'll grant the Guliani supporters another thing --- scant few of them are threatening to stay home if someone else wins the nomination.

Nah, they'll just try and hamstring the one guy who could probably pull the entire party together and who also has enough charisma and name recognition to carry over otherwise indifferent voters - all to push a guy who is at the far left of the party and who would probably split the GOP in half if nominated. So tell me - who is doing more damage to the party?

133 posted on 03/22/2007 1:35:52 PM PDT by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: jmc813

I can but I won't. You don't seem to have any trouble finding your own fights.


134 posted on 03/22/2007 1:36:11 PM PDT by onyx (DEFEAT Hillary Clinton, Marxist, student of Saul Alinsky & ally and beneficiary of Soros.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: onyx; dirtboy

For Chrissakes, would you both please chill out? You're both decent people and you both support Fred Thompson. If this childish, inter-nicene FR crap is not at least temporarily kiboshed, it's going to hurt his campaign. I'm not asking you guys to date or anything, just voluntarily don't post to each other on threads you agree on. It's not hard.


135 posted on 03/22/2007 1:38:33 PM PDT by jmc813 (The 2nd Amendment is NOT a "social conservative" issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
If Rudy were elected, and Ted Olson is sitting there banging away selecting federal judges - we're fine.

Do you really think were that gullible? Rudy had a long history of appointing, almost exclusively, liberal Democrats as judges. Rudy's interpretation of the Constitution is contrary to what I, and any conservative justice, believes. Tigers don't change their stripes. Conservatives will govern as conservatives and liberals will govern as liberals. Rudy is a liberal and that's how he would govern.

NO THANKS!

136 posted on 03/22/2007 1:39:25 PM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: onyx
You forgot to ping Jim to tattle on me. I'm telling you, you are one of the worst tattle tales and trouble makers here. I'll never forget that you were the first one out of the box to jump on the "Bush is a cokehead" band wagon.

Oh, grow a thicker skin. And get yourself past the point of making enemies online. This is full-contact season.

137 posted on 03/22/2007 1:39:44 PM PDT by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
What Kerry states does Thompson flip?

Well, since you ask again, I'll give you the same answer as I did last night:

I could see MN 51-48, WI 50-49, MI 51-48, or PA 51-49 all being potential pickups. Thompson would go over well, I think.

On the other hand, throw a New York liberal on our ticket and I'd see several red states turning blue.

138 posted on 03/22/2007 1:42:03 PM PDT by Wissa (I despise the liberal media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

You're allocating much too much power to this forum. Nobody here can make or break a candidate and neither can the whole of FR.

FR can go anti-GOP and/or Third Party if Guiliani wins the nomination, but it'll see a drastic and perhaps temporary drop in membership. We're already seeing a drop.





Scroll down to the chart --- the spike in February? That's Anna Nicole and that thread went over 25,000 posts and the new one is almost at 10,000.

http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freerepublic.com


139 posted on 03/22/2007 1:43:28 PM PDT by onyx (DEFEAT Hillary Clinton, Marxist, student of Saul Alinsky & ally and beneficiary of Soros.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Wissa
Well, since you ask again, I'll give you the same answer as I did last night: I could see MN 51-48, WI 50-49, MI 51-48, or PA 51-49 all being potential pickups. Thompson would go over well, I think.

Thank you for interjecting a good post.

140 posted on 03/22/2007 1:44:42 PM PDT by jmc813 (The 2nd Amendment is NOT a "social conservative" issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-171 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson