Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rrr51
Yes, it is true the know-nothing, knee-jerk anti-science types on this site notwithstanding. The difference is very small but can be detected.

Basically, plants preferentially take up CO2 containing lighter carbon isotopes. When fossil fuels (which, after all, are the remnants of ancient organisms) are burned, the CO2 released reflects that mass distribution and is therefore relatively lighter compared to CO2 coming from non-biologic sources.

195 posted on 03/21/2007 12:36:23 PM PDT by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: edsheppa

But how much CO2 comes from non-biologic sources?

Even limestone (seabed - magma - volcanoes) was originally plants/algea/diatoms deposited on the ocean floor.


262 posted on 03/22/2007 7:56:36 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson