Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cogitator
Your "Point 4" has been refuted by the admitted inaccuracy of where the temperature readings were taken - only in areas of increasing populations and increasing "heat island" effects. This has horribly skewed the numbers over time, and there is extreme reluctance to admit it and or make the necessary revisions.
26 posted on 03/21/2007 8:32:06 AM PDT by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: xcamel
Your "Point 4" has been refuted by the admitted inaccuracy of where the temperature readings were taken - only in areas of increasing populations and increasing "heat island" effects. This has horribly skewed the numbers over time, and there is extreme reluctance to admit it and or make the necessary revisions.

The combined land surface and ocean temperature anomalies show an increasing trend -- globally (with a smaller signal in the Southern Hemisphere). The ocean temperatures would obviously be unaffected by UHI.

The Surface Temperature Record and the Urban Heat Island

One of my points subsequent to #5 will summarize the Urban Heat Island issue, another oft-repeated incorrect point here on FreeRepublic.

37 posted on 03/21/2007 8:50:36 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson