Skip to comments.
Don't Take Poland for Granted
The Washington Post ^
| Wednesday, March 21, 2007
| Radek Sikorski
Posted on 03/21/2007 5:14:58 AM PDT by A. Pole
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
1
posted on
03/21/2007 5:15:01 AM PDT
by
A. Pole
To: A. Pole
i've never taken poland for granted
for the jokes alone, how could you?
2
posted on
03/21/2007 5:17:06 AM PDT
by
Enduring Freedom
(what does al qaeda and bush have in common? caves)
To: lizol; Vorthax; Polak z Polski; Grzegorz 246; Lukasz; JoAnka; warsaw44; anonymoussierra; Juliusz; ..
3
posted on
03/21/2007 5:17:15 AM PDT
by
A. Pole
(Angela Merkel: "Anyone who really has something to say doesn't need makeup")
Comment #4 Removed by Moderator
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: A. Pole
I do believe we neglect and take for granted east Europe far too much. Our friends in the former captive states are our true allies, not like most of the sniveling appeasers in west Europe and we need to start treating them as our top allies and friends.
That said, I hope Poland and the other states never forget despite how much gravy is sent their way by the E.U., that it is the United States principally with them against the tyrants who held them captive, it is us who guarantee their security from the bear still to this day. It is Europe, who to save there own skins found it better to appease the soviets then to provoke them over such pesky things as holding tens of millions of people hostage.
6
posted on
03/21/2007 5:33:27 AM PDT
by
spikeytx86
(Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by their fruity little club.)
To: A. Pole
Or it could provoke a spiral of misunderstanding, weaken NATO, deepen Russian paranoia B.S. Russian paranoia is a myth. All through the Cold War the left harped that we were forcing the Soviets to respond, that they were terrified that the West was going to invade. Indeed, the Soviets themselves did what they could to promote this view.
Yet, when the wall fell, there was a small window of openness when we got to see all of the Soviet military's war plans. Not a single plan was predicated on the threat of a NATO invasion.
7
posted on
03/21/2007 5:37:18 AM PDT
by
SampleMan
(Islamic tolerance is practiced by killing you last.)
To: A. Pole
Poland has always been in between a rock and a hard place. During the Second World War, they were divided between Stalin and Hitler and then fought over by brutal Communists and Nazis. But it goes back a lot further than that, as the novels of Henryk Sienkiewicz suggest. Not to mention the Teutonic Knights and the Tartars.
I can only presume that the governments of the United States and Poland thoroughly discussed the placement of defensive missiles in Poland before any announcement was made, and that the Polish government anticipated what Putin's reaction would be.
I imagine that Poland wants to be allied militarily with the United States, since the EU is a pretty weak reed. There's no easy solution for Poland, but they certainly can't afford just to sit back and wring their hands, like the editors of the Washington Post. They are right in the middle of things.
8
posted on
03/21/2007 7:54:44 AM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Cicero; A. Pole
Poland's alliance with the British and French did not save it from German invasion and the war that invasion started did not liberate Poland in the end.
I see no benefit in Poland provoking Russia because she thinks NATO will back her up. I am not too sure Americans want to fight over Polish rights to sell beef in Russia or to stop Russia bypassing Poland in building a gas pipeline to Germany.
9
posted on
03/21/2007 8:17:50 AM PDT
by
Longinus
("Whom did it benefit". (Cui Bono Fuerit) Longinus Cassius Roman conspirator & general (? - 42 BC))
To: Cicero; A. Pole
Poland's alliance with the British and French did not save it from German invasion and the war that invasion started did not liberate Poland in the end.
I see no benefit in Poland provoking Russia because she thinks NATO will back her up. I am not too sure Americans want to fight over Polish rights to sell beef in Russia or to stop Russia bypassing Poland in building a gas pipeline to Germany.
10
posted on
03/21/2007 8:20:13 AM PDT
by
Longinus
("Whom did it benefit". (Cui Bono Fuerit) Longinus Cassius Roman conspirator & general (? - 42 BC))
To: Longinus
Oops -sorry for double post.
11
posted on
03/21/2007 8:20:37 AM PDT
by
Longinus
("Whom did it benefit". (Cui Bono Fuerit) Longinus Cassius Roman conspirator & general (? - 42 BC))
To: A. Pole
I would never take pierogies for granted - ever.
Poland's political existence has always been a balancing act between the reigning powers of the day.
This missle defense system - is it aimed at Iran?
The real solution to that problem is to take out the missles.
Probably cheaper in the long run.
12
posted on
03/21/2007 8:23:18 AM PDT
by
Basheva
To: Basheva; A. Pole
This missle defense system - is it aimed at Iran? Of course not. If it were they would be based in Turkey or Bulgaria even.
13
posted on
03/21/2007 8:27:39 AM PDT
by
Longinus
("Whom did it benefit". (Cui Bono Fuerit) Longinus Cassius Roman conspirator & general (? - 42 BC))
To: Basheva
I would never take pierogies for granted - ever. Nor polska kielbasa.
14
posted on
03/21/2007 11:10:38 AM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(If you're not being shot at, it's not a high stress job.)
Comment #15 Removed by Moderator
To: Basheva
>>Poland's political existence has always been a balancing act between the reigning powers of the day. <<
not always, only since the end of 18 th century
16
posted on
03/21/2007 12:31:14 PM PDT
by
Verdelet
To: A. Pole
Sikorski's article was written shortly after Angela Merkel's meeting with Kaczynski and is clearly targeted for both American and Polish audiences. Sikorski encourages others to ask "what have you done for me lately?".
17
posted on
03/21/2007 2:22:44 PM PDT
by
Feldkurat_Katz
(What no women?s magazine ever offers to improve is women?s minds - Taki)
To: Juliusz
Sorry, but it's simply not true. Till mid 90's at least 2 years service in polish army was obligatory to all male citizens. Defensive strategy in case of NATO's aggression was widely exercised in Polish People Army. . The war plans of the USSR were not defensive. The fact that you were told as a conscript that you were serving in order to protect your homeland is hardly surprising.
As Poles, Czechs, Hungarians, etc. were not trusted by the Russians, you were to be the cannon fodder.
Also in the Soviet war plans was the use of tactical nuclear weapons to kick things off on day one.
18
posted on
03/21/2007 3:41:10 PM PDT
by
SampleMan
(Islamic tolerance is practiced by killing you last.)
To: spikeytx86
Lol - sounds like italian for me.
Hey - however good your restaurant goes luigi - remember it is us who protect you from evil. You don't want your little daughter getting hurt, do you ?
Now this has always been a good base for business in america and sicilly.
19
posted on
03/22/2007 12:46:57 AM PDT
by
Rummenigge
(there's people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
To: Longinus
What an earth would giver poland the right to have a gas pipeline payed by the germans and filled by the russians to pass their country ?
The right to earn money wihtout performance ?
20
posted on
03/22/2007 12:50:11 AM PDT
by
Rummenigge
(there's people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson