Excuse me, but your direct question was whether or not Hillary would be criticised for saying those things? Hello? look around, she is criticised for everything. You are are asking questions you already know the answer to in an attempt to bait people. You are over simplyfying issues to make a shallow point. I dont answer questions like that because I find them to be counter productive and a complete wast of my time.
LOL. You rudy people are a hoot.
I was asking a question because the answer would reveal where you stand. You refused to answer on several occasions for that very reason. When you finally address the question, you don't answer for yourself, instead you resort to the non answer of "Hello? look around, she is criticised for everything."
Let me ask you another direct question, which you will likely ignore because it is a "waste of your time" (even though you take longer to explain why you won't answer than it would take to actually answer the question.)
If a democrat candidate supported:
1. Roe v wade as "good constitutional law"
2. Public funding of abortions
3. Massive gun control at both the local and federal level
4. Campaign finance reform laws
5. "hate crime" laws
6. Global warming hysteria
7. Mccain / kennedy "amnesty" for illegals
8. Having sanctuary cities for illegal aliens - providing them with benefits and not reporting them to the federal government
If a democrat did all that, would you support them, be against them, or just look the other way?
Now I really don't expect you to actually answer that question. You will likely either ignore it or try to change the subject. Perhaps you will try the "the WOT is more important than any of that" or "I just don't want hillary or obama to win" tactics. Neither of which are actual answers, but they qualify in the minds of the rudy boosters.
Maybe you will go back to (incorrectly) insinuating I'm paid to be against rudy.
You see, the rudy boosters are predictable. They all fall into a pattern that's easy to see and expose. You know why? Because they do exactly what liberals do when you confront them. The rudy boosters have adopted the tactics of the liberals when it comes to defending rudy - maybe because that's the only way they can back rudy since when it comes to the issues, he's indefensible.
I await the next episode of "beansox spin."