the reason you don't fire gonzo is because the dems will be emboldened if you do
The Dems have been emboldened by keeping him. I can't tell you how many people I've talked to that gave up on the GOP because of the Berger amnesty.
We would not be having this discussion were RUdy president now. Nor would we be having one about Mel Martinez at the RNC.
I guess I'm one of them. Though for me, it was more like giving up on Bush - a process that started with the Harriet Myers fiasco (I don't know who would have been a more incompetent Justice her or Gonzales), continued with the border patrol agents fiasco (prosecuting the agents for the cover-up is one thing, but giving amnesty to an illegal alien drugs smuggler to bring the case against them is a whole 'nother thing) and was completed with the Berger fiasco (we're fighting them over there without ever being able to find out what they were up to over here).
bush, to demonstrate his conservative principles, would have long ago set gonzo loose
his caving to the dems is like spain running from al qaeda
weak, pathetic, dangerous to the rest of us