Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. bemoans lost chance at North Korea talks (NK jerking around U.S.)
Reuters ^ | 03/21/07 | Lindsay Beck and Jack Kim

Posted on 03/21/2007 4:00:09 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

U.S. bemoans lost chance at North Korea talks

By Lindsay Beck and Jack Kim

1 hour, 8 minutes ago

Talks aimed at ending North Korea's nuclear threat languished on Wednesday as Pyongyang waited to receive freed funds, prompting delegates to warn that the chance to press forward a disarmament plan was being lost.

The three-day session that began on Monday was meant to focus on steering forward a February 13 deal which called on North Korea to shut its main nuclear reactor and accept other disarmament steps in 60 days in return for economic aid and security assurances.

But impoverished North Korea has insisted it must first see $25 million freed from Macau's Banco Delta Asia (BDA), testing the patience of other negotiators and underscoring the pitfalls that could beset or even derail the breakthrough deal.

"There has been a real opportunity cost to this delay," U.S. envoy Christopher Hill told reporters.

"They've not completed the transfer, and until they do that the North Koreans have made clear they're not prepared to engage on the substantive discussions."

But Hill said he was still hopeful that the six countries -- the two Koreas, the United States, host China, Japan and Russia -- could keep the February accord on track.

"We've got more than three weeks to go, so I do believe that we can get there with all the commitments in the 60 days, but I had looked forward to a much more in-depth discussion this week."

Envoys expressed frustration with the delays, which have stalled discussions that were meant to focus on how to move beyond the 60-day commitments to coordinate North Korea's steps to disable its nuclear reactor with deliveries of energy aid.

"If it's not resolved, I don't know why we should just waste our time waiting for the obstacle to be cleared," South Korean envoy Chun Yung-woo said of the banking issue.

SYMBOLIC TEST

A spokeswoman for the Macau government said there had been no news of any bank move and a BDA spokesman said there had been "no further developments." A spokesman for the Bank of China, which is supposed to receive the money, was unaware of the dispute.

"It's not a big deal in terms of transfers," said spokesman Wang Zhaowen. "If it's lawful and above board, the procedures shouldn't be a problem."

But for reclusive North Korea, the money was a symbolic test, said Shi Yinhong, an international relations expert at the People's University in Beijing.

"They want to send a signal that even if they shut down the reactor as a concession, along the way they will extract maximum concessions," Shi told Reuters. "They want not just the money but also the psychological victory."

The North boycotted six-party talks for over a year, blaming Macau's freezing of the accounts, which came after Washington accused the bank of harboring North Korea's illicit earnings.

Pyongyang returned to the table in December, months after conducting its first nuclear test, which drew international condemnation and U.N. sanctions.

It was unclear whether the talks would continue beyond Wednesday. Hill said he was frustrated with waiting but also wanted the chance to discuss the issues at hand.

"I would not be surprised if there were a recess and then we were called back together at some point in the near future. I just don't know," he said. "At some point soon we're going to have to have those discussions."

(Additional reporting by John Ruwitch in Hong Kong and Teruaki Ueno and Chris Buckley in Beijing)


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 6partytalk; bda; korea; nuke; rice
But Hill said he was still hopeful that the six countries -- the two Koreas, the United States, host China, Japan and Russia -- could keep the February accord on track.

We've got more than three weeks to go, so I do believe that we can get there with all the commitments in the 60 days, but I had looked forward to a much more in-depth discussion this week

With that kind of attitude, U.S. would be thrown around like a rag doll.

They want not just the money but also the psychological victory.

Translation --- They want to show once and for all who is in charge.

I do hope that U.S. team undergo more excruciating ordeal while dealing with N. Korea. They asked for it, so the least they can do is to pay for their stupidity.

1 posted on 03/21/2007 4:00:11 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; OahuBreeze; yonif; risk; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 03/21/2007 4:00:41 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, kae jong-il, chia head, pogri, midget sh*tbag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Does anyone think that Hill understands that Kim Jong Ill is holding the US hostage, insisting on getting paid for an agreement he has no intention of keeping? No wonder every tin horn outfit feels free to poke Uncle Sap in the eye these days.


3 posted on 03/21/2007 4:36:05 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib

Hey c'mon, this the kinder, gentler approach to the Axis of Merely Misunderstood Tyrants & Despots.

Cut the Administration some slack, ok?


4 posted on 03/21/2007 4:47:50 AM PDT by mkjessup (If Reagan were still with us, he'd ask us to "win one more for the Gipper, vote for Duncan Hunter!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Bah! Let's give Kim Jong Ill the nuke he so richly deserves and be done with it.


5 posted on 03/21/2007 5:02:36 AM PDT by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

The friggin State Department has to pay off NoKo for the opportunity to be b-slapped again...Rice is Nice BS!


6 posted on 03/21/2007 5:06:25 AM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib
Does anyone think that Hill understands that Kim Jong Ill is holding the US hostage, insisting on getting paid for an agreement he has no intention of keeping? No wonder every tin horn outfit feels free to poke Uncle Sap in the eye these days

Look, this technique served Kim Chong 'Lil well under Clinton administration- why should we expect him to change?
7 posted on 03/21/2007 5:40:54 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Translation of N Korean position:

"We won't nuke you if you give us 25 million Bucks."

How low, how cheap is that?


8 posted on 03/21/2007 6:18:40 AM PDT by plenipotentiary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plenipotentiary
Re #8

This whole thing did not start with $25million extortion scheme and will not certainly end in one.

9 posted on 03/21/2007 10:24:48 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, kae jong-il, chia head, pogri, midget sh*tbag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson