To: kellynla
Majerczyk said she took the 9-year-old cat to its first-ever veterinarian visit the day of the recall.That gal's got a lot of gall. Her cat is 9 years old and she's taking it to the vet for the first time?! She obviously didn't care for the health of her cat before she learned of the pet food recall.
4 posted on
03/20/2007 4:19:44 PM PDT by
Chena
("Bush Bashing" not welcomed here.)
To: Chena
How can you say that? Maybe she knows cats and how to maintain a healthy cat?
Not so obvious to me. While I do take my pets to the doc, I can't knock someone for not doing so without a reason.
papa
10 posted on
03/20/2007 4:31:51 PM PDT by
papasmurf
(Join Team 36120 Free Republic Folders. Folding@Home Enter Name:FRpapasmurf)
To: Chena
If the cat is a purely house cat, no outside exposure, they can live to a very old age (18-20) and be perfectly healthy the entire time -- without vet visits.
15 posted on
03/20/2007 5:29:22 PM PDT by
RJS1950
(The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
To: Chena
My dear father, god bless him, never took his dogs to the vet. He bought all the correct injections at the local feed store and injected them himself.
They all would eventually die from old age.
16 posted on
03/20/2007 6:06:01 PM PDT by
sheana
To: Chena
That gal's got a lot of gall. Her cat is 9 years old and she's taking it to the vet for the first time?! She obviously didn't care for the health of her cat before she learned of the pet food recall.
Ain't that the truth! My cats get better health care than I do.
30 posted on
03/21/2007 6:47:12 AM PDT by
jrg
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson