You seem totally confused. You seem to want to lump John Marshall into the "states rights guys" but then you post a information that says the exact opposite.
John Marshall was a strong federalist. That is common knowledge. To try to lump him into "one of the states rights guys" is idiocy.
Here is 'states rights' idiocy.
Check out Barron v Baltimore in my previous post - in a decision from John Marshall's court in 1833 expressly ruling that the Bill of Rights do not apply to the states.
Barron v Baltimore is notorious as a questionable ruling by a senile Marshall trying to 'save the union'.
The erroneous Barron decision was nullified by the ratification of the 14th; -- even though it was already, in effect null & void, - as it ignored the supremacy clause of Article VI.