Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tpaine
Others, such as President Andrew Jackson and Chief Justice John Marshall, believed that the federal government had authority over the states.

You seem totally confused. You seem to want to lump John Marshall into the "states rights guys" but then you post a information that says the exact opposite.

John Marshall was a strong federalist. That is common knowledge. To try to lump him into "one of the states rights guys" is idiocy.

550 posted on 03/22/2007 8:58:26 PM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 545 | View Replies ]


To: JeffAtlanta
You seem totally confused. You seem to want to lump John Marshall into the "states rights guys" but then you post a information that says the exact opposite.
John Marshall was a strong federalist. That is common knowledge. To try to lump him into "one of the states rights guys" is idiocy.

Here is 'states rights' idiocy.

Check out Barron v Baltimore in my previous post - in a decision from John Marshall's court in 1833 expressly ruling that the Bill of Rights do not apply to the states.

Barron v Baltimore is notorious as a questionable ruling by a senile Marshall trying to 'save the union'.

The erroneous Barron decision was nullified by the ratification of the 14th; -- even though it was already, in effect null & void, - as it ignored the supremacy clause of Article VI.

614 posted on 03/23/2007 7:28:02 AM PDT by tpaine (" My most important function on the Supreme Court is to tell the majority to take a walk." -Scalia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson