Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dead Corpse
"He is saying that is doesn't matter which way you look at it."

If it didn't matter, then there would be no need to distinguish between the two.

526 posted on 03/22/2007 3:43:01 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 519 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
If it didn't matter, then there would be no need to distinguish between the two.

Sure there is. To cover their bases against people just... like... you. "But they didn't say 'the People', they said 'the people', and they didn't say 'State and Federal and Homerule City', so they must have meant just Federal even though they never drew a distinction as to who may not do the 'infringing' despite a 'Supreme Law of the Land' clause".

Shall not be infringed. By anyone. For any reason. The only reasonable way to remove access to this Right is to deprive them of their freedom via incarceration for an actual crime. Not this made up a priori garbage.

597 posted on 03/23/2007 6:29:57 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 526 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson