Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Graybeard58


Maybe, the NRA was trying to keep the question from reaching the Supremes to avoid the risk of th court blessing similar registration schemes being declared Constitutional.

They went this route instead:

Disarmed residents of the nation's capital, which is also the nation's murder capital, seem to have attracted a powerful ally in Sen. Orrin Hatch, Utah Republican. The D.C. Personal Protection Act, introduced by Mr. Hatch on July 15, would repeal the District's 27-year ban on handguns and lift prohibitions on carrying weapons in homes and businesses.

A DC law repeal would keep the Supremes from effectively extinguising the 2a as we know it.

They could be over thinking that however, but the stakes are indeed very high.


67 posted on 03/20/2007 10:41:00 AM PDT by padre35 (I am from the "let's stop eating our own" wing of the Republican Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: padre35
A DC law repeal would keep the Supremes from effectively extinguising the 2a as we know it.

And it would also keep them from enforcing the second amendment as written. Meanwhile all of us not in DC will still have our RKBA infringed upon by various state and federal "Laws", that are not really laws since they are in violation of the Constitution.

144 posted on 03/21/2007 3:56:24 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson