[CharlesWayneCT]

I think that many of us have all but conceded that Rudy will not get the pro-ferret vote.

Why NOT? Don't those Ferrets realise that Rudy is the only one who can beat Hillary? Do you think those ferrets want to live in a country with Clinton as President?

Surely they will understand that Giuliani, as President, will not ban ferrets. That's a local and state matter.

Remember, as Mayor of New York City, Giuliani really had no choice but to ban ferrets -- it's what the mayor is expected to do.

Anyway, banning ferrets was the right thing to do for the city. Sure, it goes against our freedoms, but people have to realise that freedom has to be tempered by protection, that sometimes people don't really know what they want, and the good conservative thing to do is to save them from themselves. The end justifies the means.

[beltfed308]

Remember, as Mayor of New York City, Giuliani really had no choice but to ban ferrets -- it's what the mayor is expected to do.

Especially if ferrets could endanger his friends gerbil population.

[FreeInWV]

Breaking News...... The Giuliani campaign has learned of the ferret controversy. Tonight Rudy will appear appear on with Sean Hannity and pledge to appoint only Pro-Ferret justices to the supreme court. He will also address distubing allegations about his previous judicial nominations. A Giuliani spokesman said that due to the unique nature of NYC, there were no Pro-Ferret judges to choose from. Sean will ask pointed questions like "What do ferrets eat anyway?"

[Gop1040]

"Why NOT? Don't those Ferrets realise that Rudy is the only one who can beat Hillary? Do you think those ferrets want to live in a country with Clinton as President?"

You may be right, but I doubt it. He's just too mean. However, I do see an opportunity for guys like Hunter to seize the moment and get on the pro-ferret bandwagon, and perhaps get a pump in his poll numbers....say from (*) to (1%). You never know.