I have a paleocon friend who makes this point all the time. I can't really refute it, except to say that life under a progressively declining nanny managerial state is not all that bad. If I were unhappy, I would leave for Bermuda or some other tax haven.
I have prosperred in this America, and I have done so because I do not let my political orientation get in the way of my pragmatism. Sure, I can't smoke in restaurants, but I don't smoke anyway. I get frisked by federal agents when I want to travel, but I am reasonably assured that my flight will not be terrorized. I pay over 30 percent of my income in taxes, but I have a very good income and not a great appetite for the things that money can buy, so the tax burden does not really affect the lifestyle I would lead one way or the other.
Revolution may be beneficial as far as preserving or even restoring liberty in this country, what precious little of it remains. But I would never support a liberal in the hope of bringing about societal chaos in order to make it happen.
The liberals root for a bad economy because, being opportunists, they see that a bad economy and failure in the WOT is something they can exploit. I just think that if someone promotes the worst for America, that makes them no better than the leftists.
I am trained in business and will thrive in just about any political environment, because I assume the macro environment is beyond my ability to change but within my ability to predict. But I totally understand and do not blame you for the above point of view.
No matter how bad things get, I just will not root for my country to fail.