Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Yardstick
Such a car would in fact use no energy except in the first few seconds when it was accelerating up to speed. After that it would just coast.

You should have stayed awake more often in high school physics class.

Air resistance and drag goes away when you're going a constant speed?
On what planet?

73 posted on 03/19/2007 5:39:33 PM PDT by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: Publius6961
Assumption stated in reply

He was assuming a frictionless vehicle, part of ongoing discussion of energy expenditure from acceleration vs steady state parasitic loses
77 posted on 03/19/2007 5:43:10 PM PDT by HangnJudge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

To: Publius6961

Publius, you ignorant slut.

It's common to make reasonable simplifications in these kinds of back-of-the-envelope calculations. In this case omitting air resistance is reasonable since at 20 km/hr (which is what, 12 mph?) wind resistance would be small.

My main point was that you can't use a unit that expresses energy used for a given acceleration as though it were energy used for a given distance travelled. That's mixing apples and oranges.

A further criticism would be to point out that most driving that occurs at 20 km/hr is city driving and involves lots of speeding up and slowing down. When you account for those accelerations, you're going to see a lot more energy used.


94 posted on 03/19/2007 6:22:42 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson