To: Dog
I don't like Gonzales, but he shouldn't be going down the road just to appease the dems, which appears to be the case.
6 posted on
03/19/2007 4:44:05 PM PDT by
umgud
To: umgud
To: umgud
24 posted on
03/19/2007 4:48:48 PM PDT by
mcshot
("If it ain't broke it doesn't have enough features." paraphrased anon.)
To: umgud
Well, well, looks like Gonzales ran into a spell of bad luck (just like those poor gangbangers in L.A.).
25 posted on
03/19/2007 4:49:02 PM PDT by
sheana
To: umgud
I don't like Gonzales, but he shouldn't be going down the road just to appease the dems, which appears to be the case.
It's utterly ridiculous that he's being abandoned - if he's going to go, Rove should go down as well, since it appears Gonzales was just the messenger.
I don't get this - it was okay for Billy Clinton to hire and fire attorneys who supported him or who went against what he believed, but Bush isn't allowed the same leeway? Bush isn't allowed to reward his supporters or get rid of people not toeing the party line?
You have to love the hypocrisy of the Democrats. It's just so blatant, you can't help but wonder how crazy some of them are.
To: umgud
I don't like Gonzales, but he shouldn't be going down the road just to appease the dems, which appears to be the case. Agreed. He should have been gone over the border agents and "Dog" Chapman sellouts to Mexico. OUR way. On OUR terms. But not like this.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson