Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ditto
Well, I suppose if you are operating on 'liberal logic' just 'feelings' would suffice. But in a conservative forum where we tend to vigorously debate issues, it's more or less standard to be able to back your opinion with some elements of logic based upon fact. This generally isn't a 'touchy - feely' bunch around here.

Did somebody really important die and make you arbiter of all opinions? Seriously, I made a statement (not to you) that the Copperheads were unwittingly closer to right than today's anti-war movement and pasted a copy of The Real Lincoln for effect. You made comments about the author (see #25) and suggested that I would believe Michael Moore's description of President Bush. Based on that, I don't really see how you are in a position to preach "logic based upon fact" without committing a few fallacies in the process. We apparently don't share the same view of Lincoln and the Civil War....learn to live with it.

97 posted on 03/20/2007 11:47:38 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (Osama's mama wears combat sandals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: RacerF150
So I take it that you have no idea why you think the Copperheads were right and Lincoln was bad. You just sort of think that.

Thanks.

98 posted on 03/20/2007 11:54:36 AM PDT by Ditto (Global Warming: The 21st Century's Snake Oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson