Why should I bet anything? You're the one who claimed "If you think DiLorenzo's radical Libertarian propaganda is an accurate picture of the real Lincoln, then you would probably buy Michael Moore's propaganda as an accurate description of the real George Bush." A simple review of my previous posts would have cleared that up for you. But I'm more than willing to let you continue to be wrong. As far as Thomas DiLorenzo, I don't care what you do or don't think about him. My feeling about Lincoln and the Union existed well before this book was released in 2002.
Based upon what?