Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California attorney's firing draws Dems' spotlight [a Duke Cunningham connection alleged]
LA Times ^ | March 18, 2007 | LA Times

Posted on 03/18/2007 10:36:38 PM PDT by freedomdefender

Senate Democrats signaled Sunday that of the eight U.S. attorneys abruptly fired by the Bush administration, the case in San Diego is emerging as the most troubling because of new allegations that U.S. Attorney Carol Lam was fired in a direct attempt to shut down investigations into Republican politicians in Southern California.

...

Lam spearheaded the case against Randy "Duke" Cunningham, the former Republican congressman from Rancho Santa Fe, Calif., who pleaded guilty to bribery and income-tax evasion. He was sentenced in March 2006 to eight years and four months in prison.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: billlowery; brentwilkes; carollam; cunningham; foggo; jerrylewis; usattorney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 03/18/2007 10:36:43 PM PDT by freedomdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

Feinstein said that, on May 10, Lam "sent a notice to the Justice Department saying that there would be two search warrants sent in the case of 'Dusty' Foggo and a defense contractor. The next day, an e-mail went from the Justice Department to the White House."

That May 11 e-mail was from D. Kyle Sampson, chief of staff to Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales, to White House Deputy Counsel William Kelley. "The real problem we have right now with Carol Lam ... leads me to conclude that we should have someone ready to be nominated on 11/18, the day her 4-year term expires," it read.

Sampson, who resigned last Monday, may also have been referring in that May 11 e-mail to a report that morning in the Los Angeles Times concerning a parallel investigation by federal prosecutors in Los Angeles into activities by Rep. Jerry Lewis, R-Calif., and a former GOP congressman, Bill Lowery of San Diego.


2 posted on 03/18/2007 10:37:54 PM PDT by freedomdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

Yawn. The AGs serve at the pleasure of the POTUS. He can fire whomever he wants to for whatever reason he wants to.

Would Bill Clinton apologize for firing an AG? Hell no.

Why Bush didn't just say that to begin with is why the Republican party is in the minority right now.

Cut the PC bullcrap Republicans. Rats have no mercy. We shouldn't either.


3 posted on 03/18/2007 10:40:42 PM PDT by NYRepublican72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender
Come on, Mr. President. Apologize again. "Kiss it" [Gratuitous South Park Reference]
4 posted on 03/18/2007 10:41:20 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (] Tagline Under Construction [)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

Dummies have the wrong US Atty:

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2007/03/update_on_us_attorney_firings.html


5 posted on 03/18/2007 10:44:46 PM PDT by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYRepublican72

Would Bill Clinton apologize for firing an AG? Hell no.
She ok'ed the murder of 80 people in waco and was not fired.
I would like to see someone bring that up.


6 posted on 03/18/2007 10:46:49 PM PDT by Brimack34 (Rino's need not apply)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brimack34
Would Bill Clinton apologize for firing an AG? Hell no. She ok'ed the murder of 80 people in waco and was not fired. I would like to see someone bring that up.

Not to mention how she snatched away the Gonzalez kid from his family in Florida and massacred others at Ruby Ridge.

Republicans pander way to much. It's annoying and disheartening.

7 posted on 03/18/2007 10:49:15 PM PDT by NYRepublican72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: the Real fifi

Thanks. I hadn't known that it was the US attorney in LA who was looking into Lewis, not the US attorney in SD.


8 posted on 03/18/2007 10:49:31 PM PDT by freedomdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

Obviously, neither do the Sen Dems making this ridiculous charge nor the reporter who printed it.


9 posted on 03/18/2007 10:56:20 PM PDT by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NYRepublican72
They also assaulted media and citizens in that easter raid.
10 posted on 03/18/2007 10:56:56 PM PDT by Brimack34 (Rino's need not apply)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

the Dems are so praying for a Nixonian blunder here. Vietnam and Nixon's tearing down are their crowning achievements.


11 posted on 03/18/2007 11:02:48 PM PDT by Cinnamon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender; All

Well .. I happen to know the contractor who supposedly bribed Cunningham will go on trial about the 10th of April. I know that because I was asked to serve on that jury - but my job prevents me from being able to do it.

I have no idea if this was a continuation of Lamb's investigation or not.

The dems are just plucking at straws .. and their concerns are really a condition called "projection technique". According to a psychiatrist .. the projection technique is used to accuse your enemy of doing things that you have either ALREADY DONE - OR ARE IN THE PROCESS OF DOING.

The Clintons have already done this .. they fired their 93 AG's in order to hide the fact that 2 of them were the target - because those 2 AG's were investigating FOB's. Soooooo .. they assume the Bush's would do the same thing they were doing.

Believe me .. I lived with a person with this type of personality and I can tell you for a fact that it's devastating to be accused of doing things (you're not doing) when in truth the person who's accusing you is really doing those things.

THIS IS A STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR THE DEMS - they have just now confessed they fired their 93 AG's FOR PURE POLITICAL REASONS!! LOL!!

Oh .. and if anybody hasn't figured out what the mistake was .. IT WAS BECAUSE GONZALES SAID THAT THE FIRINGS WERE NOT DONE FOR POLITICAL REASONS .. WHEN IT'S WELL KNOWN THAT THESE ARE POLITICAL APPOINTMENTS.


12 posted on 03/18/2007 11:08:24 PM PDT by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYRepublican72

Duke Cunningham was a true blue hero of the Vietnam War and then turned into a power corrupted POS who deserves every year of prison to which he was sentenced. To fire a U.S. Attorney for digging into the corruption of Cunningham or any other legislator is every bit as despicable as taking a bribe from a defense contractor. Political power can corrupt nearly everyone, regardless of party, and such corruption should never be excused or covered up. If the AG knew about or ordered it, he ought to resign or be fired himself for being corrupt himself. And if the POTUS or anyone else in his White House knew about it or ordered it, then they deserve the same fate. Serving at the pleasure of the President is not license to wield power capriciously.


13 posted on 03/18/2007 11:29:31 PM PDT by DryFly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DryFly

Or those making causations without knowing the facts and only ASSUMING they know the facts, should keep their mouths shut.

That is why the loony left should never be taken seriously. They have always had the need to make claims that they can not or will not back and shame on the Republicans who do not put them in their place.

Much of the our so called Democrat leadership have shown they aren't even qualified to run as dog dogcatchers let alone be politicians.

Today, Victoria Toensing have gotten to be somewhat a hero to me and I think some of the Republicans should review how to handle liars like Waxman and his monkey buddies. The Republicans should learn to take them to task or they deserve their fate.

The Democrat leadership should be shown the error of their ways and sent away.


14 posted on 03/18/2007 11:48:13 PM PDT by Tut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DryFly
Feinstein said that, on May 10 [2006], Lam "sent a notice to the Justice Department saying that there would be two search warrants sent in the case of 'Dusty' Foggo and a defense contractor. The next day, an e-mail went from the Justice Department to the White House."

That May 11 e-mail was from D. Kyle Sampson, chief of staff to Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales, to White House Deputy Counsel William Kelley. "The real problem we have right now with Carol Lam ... leads me to conclude that we should have someone ready to be nominated on 11/18, the day her 4-year term expires," it read.


The actual FACT is that Lam was on the firing hit list at least as early as March 2... 2005. See the e-mail on page 5 at the link. Why? Well, And there were concerns by some in the administration about how lax Lam and some other U.S. Attorneys offices along the Mexican border were handling those caught trying to illegally enter the U.S. (see Page 23 at this link and Page 1 at this link). And according to newspaper reports, her office also reportedly wasn't devoting as much attention as some in the administration would have liked to combating gun crime.

And US Attorney Ryan was on and off the firing list at various times, including on January 2006 (see page 21 at the link). Why? Contrary to statements made some places in the press, morale was really low at the San Francisco US Attorney's office, and there were concerns about how Ryan was running the office.

But let's not let the facts get in the way of the CREW-driven, Schumer demagoguing Democrat agenda.
15 posted on 03/19/2007 12:47:24 AM PDT by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: Post5203
I beleive Ruby Ridge took place during the GHW Bush administration in August of '92. The AG was William Barr.

That's correct. It's a fact many of us tend to forget. Waco was Reno's doing. Ruby Ridge was not.
17 posted on 03/19/2007 1:19:25 AM PDT by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DryFly

Ahem. See post #5. Then chill.


18 posted on 03/19/2007 5:22:58 AM PDT by saganite (Billions and billions and billions----and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

In california if voteing worked they wouldn't let us do it.


19 posted on 03/19/2007 5:37:55 AM PDT by Vaduz (and just think how clean the cities would become again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DryFly

I agree with you.


20 posted on 03/19/2007 5:55:45 AM PDT by GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson