Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: preacher

Well, of course there are missing details. This is Star Tribune story.

They probably didn't object to a search. The khat was probably in plain view.


15 posted on 03/18/2007 8:58:19 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (Carry Daily. Apply Sparingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: ButThreeLeftsDo

"Well, of course there are missing details. This is Star Tribune story."

You're right, however:

"They probably didn't object to a search."

Most people think a request to search is not a mere request, but an order. The police are wearing uniforms & are armed. The legal phrase is, "operating under color of law."

Some people believe that a refusal to permit a search is in itself, "reasonable suspicion."


18 posted on 03/18/2007 9:43:24 PM PDT by preacher (A government which robs from Peter to pay Paul will always have the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson