If you think cursing at another poster makes an "articulate" debate....well
I've never done it and never will.
I reject the premise of your post.
It's no more "cursing" than the employ of the word "frigging", with exception the intent is more direct articulation.
I've never done it and never will.
Your posting record is available for everyone to see.
I reject the premise of your post.
Okay. But if you aren't capable of discernment between Hunter's co-sponsorship and support of the bill banning PBA and Giuliani's statement that he never supported nor believed his position would ever change to support such a bill equates to the same position, either you're being purposefully dishonest or simply ignorant.
You've frequently deposited the same equestrian emitted former field fodder without due challenge, so I ask you simply back up your assertion. Is my description of your posts more politically suitable than the more direct approach employed by Pissant?
A while back a fellow poster, whom I still admire, challenged FReepers provide him a list of five judge appointments of Giuliani who are liberals. I took that challenge and gave him the list and provided the links to the info on their bio's. Since, there have been a lot more inquiry into those justices' records.
Don't think for a moment that just because you think something you post is unquestionable and it sounds good to you, others won't do investigative homework.
I could say the point is, if you repeatedly post the same garbage - even though others ignore you with the fervency of an adolescent's pimple, sooner or later someone will challenge you to provide support for your claim because the cyst is simply annoying to look at but I, kind of, impasse.