Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Child Molesters: Death Is The Only Answer
Liberals Cost Lives ^ | 3-17-07 | MissEdie

Posted on 03/17/2007 10:17:00 AM PDT by MissEdie

Just how many more children have to die before Liberals realise that the death penalty is the only answer to this problem? This week we learn of the kidnap, murder and probable sexual assault of little Christopher Barrios by a convicted sex offender. Another animal out on the streets free to rape and kill again and again thanks to Liberal policies. Almost every time we hear of a child or young man or woman going missing it turns out to be a convicted sex offender that is responsible. How much longer should we tolerate people of this kind within our society? The truth is we should not permit it for a moment longer, nor should we put them in prison populations. The simple answer is that we should kill them; all of them.

There is absolutely no reason on this earth that anyone can give for keeping them alive; not one. But the one group of people fighting to keep them on the streets, fighting to allow them to live amongst our children, fighting to keep them alive, is Liberals. Think how many lives could have been saved if we executed child molesters at the first offense? How can anyone argue that their right to be released into society after a prison term trumps our children's right to live and be free of perverted sex attacks? Liberals may like to answer that question.

Even a 25 year fixed prison term is not enough. Why should tax payers pay to feed them, give them a roof over their heads, pay for them to work out in a gym, to read books, watch cable TV, have a law library? Liberals want them to have "treatment" which we all know doesn't work, but why should tax payers pay for that also? Why should we pay for expensive monitoring systems? The simple answer is: we shouldn't. They should be executed. Dead people don't re-offend. It shoud be a quick process. If the conviction is based upon DNA or a confession and it is lock tight, then execution should come within a week of conviction. If there are appeals then a new streamlined appeals system should be created so that if it fails they are dead within a year of conviction. They should not be allowed to languish on Death Row for 20 years consuming tax payer dollars.

There really is no reasonable argument against this. Other than Liberals, who would want to argue for child molesters and against the safety of our children? Liberals are prepared to let our children die in order to let child molesters live. Liberals are for protecting sex offenders but not their victims. Isn't this always the way with Liberals? They are on the side of George Edenfield and John Couey and against Jessica Lunsford and Christopher Barrios. What a shameful position to take, but take it they do.

If things don't change soon then the regular citizens will have to protect their children from these animals and then Liberals will be wanting to put the parents in jail for protecting their children. Once again, Liberals will always jump to the defense of the criminal and leave the victim vulnerable. If you go to the sex offender website for your county and see how many of these scum there are on your streets you will be horrified. Put there by Liberals.

RIP Christopher Barrios, another child killed by Liberals.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: elections; homosexualagenda; lawandorder; liberals; moralabsolutes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: CGTRWK
When that 14 year old dresses and acts indistinguishably from an 18 year old slut - or a 24 year old slut for that matter - and fools a drunken college boy at a party, you want the state to kill him?

I am not a policy / legislating genius. I would like the law (if I were Queen) to make death penalty for anyone sexually abusing a young child. However, the cases would be difficult. Imagine a babysitter accused of molesting a child in the bath, but it's hearsay with no scars on the child. You wouldn't get far prosecuting that, either.

And if we say that we would not want anyone 12 and under molested, I believe we are encouraging the pedophiles who prey on young teens. That upsets me greatly. Especially a perv who has molested more than one teen. I'd like to see strong penalties for statutory rape; maybe short of death unless multiple kids are involved?

61 posted on 03/17/2007 2:23:27 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MissEdie
Bump
To read later
62 posted on 03/17/2007 2:27:48 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ccmay
I am in favor of the death penalty for real child molesters, but your proposal is idiotic moral hysteria.

Not idiotic. Just not carefully planned. Perhaps as in my previous post the law could best be worded with severe penalties for those who molest only one teen, but those convicted of molesting more than one could receive death?

People maybe do not understand how an adult having sex with a teen ruins the teen's thinking and life for some time, if not forever. This should be discouraged strongly. Penalties now are not strong enough.

We can't compare this with our grandparents, who married in their teens. That was very different from today's coaches and teachers getting off on their students.

63 posted on 03/17/2007 2:28:09 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: zendari
What these teachers did was wrong, but it was with clearly consenting students.

Underage people should not be given the power to consent. They do not have the right decision-making processes, no matter how smart and no matter how sexually mature.

64 posted on 03/17/2007 2:29:36 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
Elvis Presley once noted that he had bedded 5000 girls. He had his pick of thousands of adoring young women. How many do you suppose he asked for ID? How many grandmothers are out there now who were among the chosen? Is it a 'treasured secret' or a 'buried nightmare'? Would the general society have been better served with Elvis swinging from a lamp post? Lots of questions and few clear answers.

I know of one County Attorney who was elected partly on a promise to vigorously prosecute every "child molester" (and partly because his opponent was caught with a near underage girl). He asked the Sheriff to bring him every case because he was going to clean up the county. Within weeks he had so many cases that it would have taken his entire staff his entire term to prosecute them if they handled no other cases. He had to back completely off. It is far more prevalent than most people recognize.

65 posted on 03/17/2007 3:18:21 PM PDT by MARTIAL MONK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
Underage people should not be given the power to consent. They do not have the right decision-making processes, no matter how smart and no matter how sexually mature.

Hence statutory rape laws. But to call this 'child molestation' is ridiculous.

I'm saying this from a very pro death penalty perspective.

66 posted on 03/17/2007 7:38:34 PM PDT by zendari
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
And if we say that we would not want anyone 12 and under molested, I believe we are encouraging the pedophiles who prey on young teens. That upsets me greatly. Especially a perv who has molested more than one teen. I'd like to see strong penalties for statutory rape; maybe short of death unless multiple kids are involved?

Those 'young teens' were getting married and having kids 1000 years ago.

Human biology certainly designated them as ready.

67 posted on 03/17/2007 7:42:06 PM PDT by zendari
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
And if we say that we would not want anyone 12 and under molested

I don't want anyone of any age molested. But molestation isn't an arbitrary, one-size-fits-all age. Molestation is taking one sided advantage of one party's immaturity or social subordinate status. You can do that to a retarded 35 year old and it'd be just as wrong as touching a 12 year old.

68 posted on 03/17/2007 8:48:24 PM PDT by CGTRWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

Courtesy of LiberalsCostLives.com, Here's how a victim of child molestation feels about this:

Kyal wrote:
I was born into child pornography. My genetic birth mother was a pedophile. I was unable to remember anything before the age of about nine until I went thru ‘recall’ in my mid-thirties. At first you think you’re crazy until you realize these memory ‘flashes’ are real, then you wish you were crazy. Anything would be better than this being real. It begins to sink in. This is not a bad dream you can wake up from, it is an actual part of your literal life. You will resort to anything to block these memories, living on pure adrenaline, not sleeping for weeks at a time because your nightmares are not nightmares. The medical term for a stab wound is a “hard laceration”. I have nine of them on my left forearm. You begin to substitute physical pain to mask your heartache. When you cut yourself the first time, you experience a euphoric relief that is by far the most wonderful feeling you have ever had in your entire life. Your wound hurts like hell, but that unbearable ache in your heart is in the background for the first time in your life! The adrenaline stops. You can sleep for a few nights…it is heaven on earth and you feel brand new. But the cut heals and the heartache and the adrenaline comes back. The next time you cut deeper hoping the euphoria will be even greater and last longer, but it becomes like every other addiction, it stops working no matter how much you increase the dose or how deep you push the knife. My first self inflicted wound was near the top of my forearm close to my elbow and went across my arm. Each cut got lower and deeper. The last two were deep and not across my wrist, but lengthwise. I told myself I was just trying to hurt myself to stop the pain, when in reality, I was coming to peace with the fact that the knife had to go as deep as it had to go. If it could no longer deliver me from this heartache, it could at least finally end this torture, except for one thing: I also knew I was the only dad my two somehow perfect boys would ever have. So I made the decision that I was not going to kill myself, and God gave me the strength to live. What my genetic mother and her boyfriend and their monstrous friends did to me and forced me to do, tortured every single moment of my life for the next thirty years. There is only one thing that could be worse. That would be to re-live my torturous childhood by repeating it. So I say kill any child rapist after their first offense, especially a so-called “victim” of abuse who knows first hand the torturous heartbreak they inflict on that innocent child for every single moment of the rest of their lives. Child rapists suffer from a spiritual deformity that we on earth have no way of dealing with, much less curing. The only right thing to do, the only compassionate thing to do with a child rapist, is to execute them after their first offense.

Thank God he's been able to survive his ordeal.


69 posted on 03/18/2007 5:18:44 AM PDT by MissEdie (Liberalscostlives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: MissEdie

Now I suppose you'll tell us you're against homosexuals and their agenda for America. (It's all about the children.)


70 posted on 03/18/2007 5:31:18 AM PDT by mborman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mborman

Homosexuals should not have an agenda for anything, let alone America. They should keep their sexuality a private matter as most heterosexuals do. That way most people would not have a problem with it. Instead they seem to want to ram it down your throat and stick your face in it, no pun intended.


71 posted on 03/18/2007 7:34:55 AM PDT by MissEdie (Liberalscostlives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson