[DainBramage]

When his son was shot and they began to negotiate he should have sent out his wife and daughter...period, no if ands or buts. He didnt. His wife was hit when they shot through the door or wall at him. Your a fool if you think they would have tried to shoot his wife on purpose.

I agree the charges most certainly didnt warrant the force used. I further think they should have just backed off and waited after his son was hit. Im sure you think you are aware of "facts" that Im not. But Weavers story is just as full of BS. He wasnt an simple quiet man trying to live out his life without electricity and water. He was a full blown White Supremest anti government no tax paying whacko.

[tpaine]

Can you refute the Justice Dept report cited?

Replies
Address:http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1802367/replies?c=37

[brazzaville]

Good morning.
"Your a fool if you think they would have tried to shoot his wife on purpose."

You don't know what you're talking about, about Weaver, his family and their motives or about the motives and actions of the Feds who created the whole mess.

And you are calling people fools.

Michael Frazier

[mississippi red-neck]

White Supremest anti government no tax paying whacko.

So where our founding Fathers and those that wrote our Constitution .

[PhilipFreneau]

>>>He was a full blown White Supremest anti government no tax paying whacko.<<<

Weaver was not a White Supremecist. That was a lie spread by government thugs to turn simpletons against Weaver.

[savedbygrace]

And your post #49 proves even moreso that you don't know the facts. Go study up on the case and come back with a cogent argument that agrees with the facts.

[DuncanWaring]

He was a ... no tax paying whacko.

If, by "no tax paying" you mean he didn't pay income tax, you're probably right.

But that's irrelevant.

He was dirt-poor (which is why he accepted the job of cutting-down the shotgun - for a few bucks he desperately needed), had a wife and several kids. In those circumstances, he owed no income tax.