[JSteff]

"There was enough trouble restraining people after 9/11, but going after kids? Only a muzzie would stoop that low and THEY'D better be ready for their families and acquaintances (presuming the terrorists aren't still alive) to pay the price and pay dearly."

No one had to be restrained. As far as families of terrorists go, the family of the guy who shot up all those people in that mall while yelling allah akbar did news interviews.
After 9/11 relations of Osam and several other questionable saudi nationals were given government escort to the airports...
President Bush had Immams related to terrorist organizations to the white house to talk about how islam is the rop and muslims are peaceful, loving citizens.

[nw_arizona_granny]

Calpernia, you had a thread on the bus company that was not checking the drivers, do you have the link?

Struwwelpeter, do you have links to Beslan murders, that should be here?

Thanks to you both, for knowing so much more than I can ever remember.

[starbase]

metmom: "There was enough trouble restraining people after 9/11...

[ JSteff: "No one had to be restrained." ]

Actually that's not entirely true, remember some unfortunate Sikhs were shot after 9/11? And this time everyone is primed and very aware of who the enemy is.

I, of course, do not condone nor want violence to occur, but whacking children all over the place, plus the fact that the war and who the enemy is (and what he/she looks like) is much more on the national mind right now, so I'm guessing there will be waves of violence all across the country should an attack, or a series of attacks, against children be successful.

[happygrl]

Everything you've said is true.