Replies

The article states that there is not a "gay gene"

And there isn't, no matter what the radicals pushing the homosexual agenda say.

The article... pretty clearly states that "sexual orientation is genetically influenced..."...and that there are in fact "predispositions"

Uh-huh. That doesn't mean anybody is born gay nor that homosexuality his hardwired. Linkages, associations, heritability, etc, must all be understood to have an informed opinion on the matter. You can't pull comments out of context and expect science to agree with you.

My point is that this study....like all others into this subject is completely inconclusive. I won't even get into the "who cares" factor....I'd personally rather these monies be spent on some ailment of a more life threatening type.

"Mapping" DNA is very different than actually knowing what it does.

"Junk DNA" is DNA that scientists have no effing clue as to it's purpose as well as it's interaction with other DNA.

The only logical conclusion one can arrive at is that we (humans) still do not know enough about the intricacies of this subject to come to any definitive answer.

This scientist just suckered some moron or group of morons to pay him to conduct a study into a subject that we (humans) do not have the basis to extrapolate a definitive conclusion from due to incomplete data.

More power to him. I hope he made enough for a nice new car or an in ground swimming pool.

Get back to me when every molecule of "junk DNA" can be properly examined and the function of which can be determined.

Until then the jury is still out.

Hey scrip

I thought we got all the pro-sodomy cheerleaders zotted two years ago.

Let me know which chromosome holds the "gay" DNA sequence, maybe it's next to the alcoholism genome. Can your pro-sodomy cheerleader show us which sequence either is held?

Let me guess, your pro-sodomy cheerleader has perversionist friends and she's defending their honor? There's a new one for FR...NOT! LOL!!!!