Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lugsoul
you do at least agree that it is the responsibility of those with a security clearance to ensure that the information they are sharing with reporters is not classified, right? I mean, you don't think they have to have someone else tell them what they can and can't talk about with the press, do you? Doesn't that responsibility rest with the person talking to a reporter? Is that the agreement they sign when they obtain their clearance?

As someone who has been cleared for classified information at various times in my career, I can say that if the information was not properly labeled as classified when it was received, there's no reason for the person to have to verify that it is not classified.

885 posted on 03/16/2007 10:41:02 AM PDT by kevkrom (WARNING: The above post may contain sarcasm... if unsure, please remember to use all precautions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 863 | View Replies ]


To: kevkrom

Did you sign an SF-312? Did you read it?


890 posted on 03/16/2007 10:43:09 AM PDT by lugsoul (Livin' in fear is just another way of dying before your time. - Mike Cooley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 885 | View Replies ]

To: kevkrom

"I can say that if the information was not properly labeled as classified when it was received, there's no reason for the person to have to verify that it is not classified."

Second that. You'd spend your entire day/week/year verifying classification status.


895 posted on 03/16/2007 10:44:20 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 885 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson