Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Live Thread - House Oversight and Government Reform Cmte. hearing (Valerie Plame Wilson Testifies)
Cspan ^ | March 16, 2007

Posted on 03/16/2007 5:55:58 AM PDT by Mo1

Edited on 03/16/2007 5:57:55 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

ON CAPITOL HILL Valerie Wilson Testifies

Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) chairs a House Oversight and Government Reform Ctme. hearing on the disclosure of CIA Agent Valerie Plame Wilson's identity. The hearing will look into whether White House officials followed appropriate procedures for safeguarding the identity of Ms. Wilson.

FRIDAY, C-SPAN AT 10AM ET


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: 007; bs; cia; cialeak; deskjockey; henrywaxman; hogwash; iraq; liarplame; mrswannabebondslut; nonsense; notatrisk; officespace; paperpusher; plame; teachingthegop; unclassifiedposition; valerieplame; valeriewilson; waxman; wilson; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 801-820821-840841-860 ... 1,501-1,504 next last
To: Proudcongal

This isn't about the leak; and they're never going to mention Armitage; they consider him one of "theirs."

We all know what this is about.


821 posted on 03/16/2007 10:14:16 AM PDT by Howlin (Honk if you like Fred Thompson!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 816 | View Replies]

To: JFC

Since the Wilsons claim that they fear for their lives, does anyone know if they have hired body guards....or is the Pink crowd providing that?


822 posted on 03/16/2007 10:14:34 AM PDT by Carolinamom (Whatever you voted for, you did not vote for failure -- President Bush SOTU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 810 | View Replies]

To: italianquaker
"They have no balls, sitting behind the skids was a women with an impeach bush shirt"

I hope you're kidding when you said "woman." That IS no woman...it's a drag queen from Code Pink.

823 posted on 03/16/2007 10:14:37 AM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway~~John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 758 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
Harlow asked Novak not to publish.

Not quite.

David quotes Novak’s account of his exchange with Harlow, from his October 03 column:

NOVAK (10/1/03): At the CIA, the official designated to talk to me denied that Wilson's wife had inspired his selection [for the trip to Niger] but said she was delegated to request his help. He asked me not to use her name, saying she probably never again will be given a foreign assignment but that exposure of her name might cause "difficulties" if she travels abroad. He never suggested to me that Wilson's wife or anybody else would be endangered. If he had, I would not have used her name. I used it in the sixth paragraph of my column because it looked like the missing explanation of an otherwise incredible choice by the CIA for its mission.

http://www.dailyhowler.com/dh072905.shtml

824 posted on 03/16/2007 10:15:12 AM PDT by redgirlinabluestate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 774 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

"Norton playing a video of Scott McClelland at a press conference"

Norton went many years without paying her taxes. Or even filing.

She didn't go to jail. She went to Congress.

And it didn't even matter that DC shouldn't have a congressman.

She went anyway.

She's a real stickler for the rule of law.


825 posted on 03/16/2007 10:15:54 AM PDT by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 814 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
They are after Rove, too

They want he Security Clearance pulled in the worst way

Gee .. I wonder why??

826 posted on 03/16/2007 10:16:08 AM PDT by Mo1 ( http://www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 815 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

I believe that Plame would have been hired and trained for the CIA during CLINTON's tenure...and all of the terrorist activity...AND the so-called spying on Saddam happened during this time...

Therefore...judging from the way Plame came across today...I would say it is VERY UNDERSTANDABLE...why our CIA has had any intelligence wrong.

She is a joke.


827 posted on 03/16/2007 10:16:11 AM PDT by Txsleuth (I don't know who I am voting for yet...just window shopping.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 784 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom

... possibly the world! ;-P


828 posted on 03/16/2007 10:16:21 AM PDT by pinz-n-needlez (Jack Bauer wears Tony Snow pajamas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 793 | View Replies]

To: Proudcongal

I have not heard the words "Richard Armitage" yet, but have not listened to every word.


829 posted on 03/16/2007 10:16:46 AM PDT by maica (America will be a hyperpower that's all hype and no power -- if we do not prevail in Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 816 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Here is the entire text of the post I responded to:

He's just upset because I said I didn't want a guy with an Uzi living next door to me.

Now, I have no idea who "he" is, because your post wasn't responding to him, but to someone else. I just know you are saying you didn't want a guy with an Uzi living next door to you, and I thought you might like it if that person came to your defense.

However, now that you made me go all the way back and read your comment, I'm betting that the "person who owns an Uzi" is not a generic statement regarding people with guns, but in fact the "HE" that you were fighting with earlier. Having not followed the sniping, I don't know that to be the case, but it would explain why you are upset at me for what I thought was a rational response to your fear of gun people living next door.

I'm not sure I really should have to apologize for taking your statement more objectively than you made it, but on the other hand, I can certainly apologize for not checking back to see why you were so upset at my first response before continuing the conversation.

I hope you can see now that your statement did NOT make it clear who the "person with an uzi" was, and that it was perfectly logical for me to assume you didn't want ANYBODY with an uzi living next door.

830 posted on 03/16/2007 10:17:23 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 799 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom

the WILSON's are moving to hate hippie capital of the southwest, Santa Fe, NM. They will welcome them and then have them run for office and win. And Win they will out there in the land of nuts and fruits who do not shave or wear BAN roll-on. I find the Wilsons to be money hungry slackers who are being used by the Dimo party. I really really dispise the left! When they get in power all hell will break out and it will forever be blamed on the Bush administration. These libs make me sick at my tummy, and unable to digest lunch.


831 posted on 03/16/2007 10:18:25 AM PDT by JFC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 822 | View Replies]

To: maica
"Abu Ghraib" into his questioning.

They also got in "fired US Attorneys" and "Walter Reed".

832 posted on 03/16/2007 10:19:09 AM PDT by noexcuses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 818 | View Replies]

To: redgirlinabluestate

You must be kidding. I dislike her intensely, but she is a VERY attractive woman. On the outside.


833 posted on 03/16/2007 10:19:58 AM PDT by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 764 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill

Saturday Night Live will have a field day with this hearing and how they ask the same damn question over and over and over and over


834 posted on 03/16/2007 10:20:05 AM PDT by Mo1 ( http://www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 825 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

he need to do something about that penis with eyes look!


835 posted on 03/16/2007 10:20:12 AM PDT by Always Independent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom

Pink crowd providing that?


Code PINK is their body guards for sure.. no one wants to get anywhere near the Wilson's with the stinch that comes from those nasty so-called ladies.


836 posted on 03/16/2007 10:20:27 AM PDT by JFC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 822 | View Replies]

To: JFC

I'm hungry for lunch. For some reason pork keeps popping into my head, but it's Friday. Darn...


837 posted on 03/16/2007 10:21:28 AM PDT by ChuckShick (He's clerking for me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 836 | View Replies]

To: tiredoflaundry

YOu got it - you are watching the "slow bleed" approach to a coup d'etat!


838 posted on 03/16/2007 10:21:30 AM PDT by Sioux-san (God save the Sheeple)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 817 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Now Waxman is quoting Woodward and going to war

I'm telling you .. this is about the Downing Street Memo


839 posted on 03/16/2007 10:21:35 AM PDT by Mo1 ( http://www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 821 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

The entire hearing so far is too boring to be mentioned on SNL.


840 posted on 03/16/2007 10:22:04 AM PDT by tirednvirginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 834 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 801-820821-840841-860 ... 1,501-1,504 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson