Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aviator; A.A. Cunningham

High deflection, 1.7 G, no lead, nose low, flight path marker buried even lower, 179 ias, huge HCA, no energy . . .

Gun kill? I doubt it. Looks more like a stall recovery. Any bullets coming out of that airplane are going to the bottom of the screen.

Hornet was probably already a mort and Raptor was moving on to next target.

AA Cunningham keeps putting out that silly photo. Somebody explain to him what "lead" is - he seems unclear on the concept. Anybpdy can bunt a reticle dot on the target - it doesn't mean the bullets are going there. He just can't accept the fact that the Navy is stuck with old, non-stealthy aircraft. He should stop embarrassing himself.


71 posted on 03/15/2007 6:30:14 PM PDT by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: oldbill

I like what you said ;-)


Serious question follows: It appears to me (I suck at photo inter.) that the Raptor is flying from left to right, crossing below the Hornet flying right to left. How the H@LL do you get a lock-up (or a gun kill) with those physics? [aside from a golden BB scenario]

I think your scenario that the Hornet is a mort is a good one. Perhaps the Raptor jock was offering a "you're number 1" moment to the Hornet driver, or vice versa.


119 posted on 03/16/2007 5:30:44 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson