Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bw17
Maybe it's in the redacted part.

Why would it be? It's in the administration's interest to release that sort of information.

58 posted on 03/14/2007 5:09:33 PM PDT by Zeroisanumber (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Zeroisanumber

"Why would it be? It's in the administration's interest to release that sort of information."

Maybe. But timing is everything. There may be some good reasons to hold back on all that Khalid said.


78 posted on 03/14/2007 5:26:53 PM PDT by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: Zeroisanumber
Why would it be? It's in the administration's interest to release that sort of information.

For the same reason (a reason I dont know)they wont come clean about the anthrax attacks. Over the years since 2001, I have become convinced Saddam was behind them. Why wont the admin fess up?

124 posted on 03/14/2007 6:17:55 PM PDT by cardinal4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson