What's your point? That bigots sometimes run businesses, or that the Government has unconstitutionally seized the authority to ban bigotry?
The second. That authority is not enumerated nor described by the constitution that I'm sworn to support and defend. The derivitive question is: by usurping such authority and by cloaking it as *precedent,* are those who do so among the enemies, foreign and domestic from whom the constitution requires protection- and how best to fulfill that obligation.