And if he conditions that permission on what is in your car? Let's take guns out of the equation. Say an employer makes a rule that you cannot leave valuables in your car in his lot, because he believes that would attract thieves. You agree, but decide to leave some jewelry in the car, because your work precludes its wearing during work. Your boss discovers that, and terminates your employment for violating his rules that you agreed to.
Valid or invalid? Is your fundamental right to own property superior to his fundamental right to decide what is allowed on his property?
Lex:
And if he conditions that permission on what is in your car?
Your employers 'conditions' cannot deprive his employees of their constitutional rights.
Let's take guns out of the equation.
Lets not. Guns are beyond question an enumerated right.
Say an employer makes a rule that you cannot leave valuables in your car in his lot, because he believes that would attract thieves. You agree, but decide to leave some jewelry in the car, because your work precludes its wearing during work. Your boss discovers that, and terminates your employment for violating his rules that you agreed to.
Your boss made an unreasonable 'rule', coerced your agreement to it, then violated your property [your vehicle] searching to find his 'contraband'. A jury will laugh him out of court.
Valid or invalid? Is your fundamental right to own property superior to his fundamental right to decide what is allowed on his property?
Property owners who do business in the USA are obligated to obey our "Law of the Land". [just as all of us are] -- Our supreme law says we have a right to own & carry arms, which shall not be infringed.
Trying to restrict the carrying of arms to & from work is an infringement, no matter who initiates the 'ban'.
Let's say that the employer does not choose to employ Jewish folks, or ones whose skin is darker than his own.