To: Old Dirty Bastiat
I see your point about property rights, but isn't my car MY property?
Isn't your body your property too?
34 posted on
03/14/2007 7:27:58 AM PDT by
Zon
(Honesty outlives the lie, spin and deception -- It always has -- It always will.)
To: Zon; Old Dirty Bastiat; y'all
"-- The keeping of firearms in a vehicle is a preeminent right that is well-grounded in law and public policy. Legislatures must stop the abuse of our most basic and fundamental Second Amendment rights --"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
old dirty bastiat:
I see your point about property rights, but isn't my car MY property?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Zon:
Isn't your body your property too?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A [constitutionally based] 'public policy' compromise has been made [in the workplace] between an absolute personal right to be armed, and a business owners right to control employees behavior on the job.
Employees can carry ~to~ the job, and leave their arms locked in their vehicles while working.
Why is this compromise opposed? Who benefits by restricting the individuals right to carry?
41 posted on
03/14/2007 8:05:37 AM PDT by
tpaine
(" My most important function on the Supreme Court is to tell the majority to take a walk." -Scalia)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson