You are wrong about USC sec 926a. It does not regulate private property, and therefore has nothing to do with this issue.
You are wrong about the parking lot not being part of the workplace. It is. And so is the loading dock, the driveway, the perimeter fence, the " locker room, where your personal belongings are stored until your workday is finished", and every other square inch of property owned by the businessman doing business at that place. And it would not matter a whit if it were not associated with your actual office space; it is still private property, subject to the owner's permission.
You are wrong that your car is not on the site of the workplace when you park in the company's private lot.
You are wrong when you describe the termination of an business association as "force", for whatever reason, rational or irrational. It is the exercise of a 1st amendment right.
You are wrong when you describe principled opposition to the trampling of property rights as "near apoplexy", and try to infer it is fear of guns. I have no fear of guns, but I have an abiding distaste for "good intentioned" individuals like you using the government to erode property rights, whether it is to "cure institutional racism" or "give access to handicapped" or "promote the exercise of the 2nd amendment".
In short, you have been wrong on every single point of argument and counterargument on this thread, even when you manage to abandon the logical fallacies of straw man attacks, ad hominums, and begging questions and attempt one.
I am actually tired of flogging you so overwhelmingly. What you have not managed to do with logic and argument, you have done by sheer imperviousness to reason. I surrender the thread to you, and let our posts speak for themselves to any future reader to decide.
Not applicable here. That law deals with transport on public roads to and from where you may lawfully possess a firearm. Try again.
How lame, - try again yourself. -- That law deals with transport on public roads to and from your home; --where you may lawfully possess a firearm.
You are wrong about USC sec 926a. It does not regulate private property, and therefore has nothing to do with this issue
Just above you admitted: "-- That law deals with transport on public roads to and from where --" [your home] "-- you may lawfully possess a firearm. --"
In short, you have been wrong on every single point of argument and counterargument on this thread, even when you manage to abandon the logical fallacies of straw man attacks, ad hominums, and begging questions and attempt one.
You can't post ~any~ "-- straw man attacks, ad hominums, and begging questions --" from me, -- so you simply make up your own.
I am actually tired of flogging you so overwhelmingly.
Boasting is a form of cheap self-flogging.
What you have not managed to do with logic and argument, you have done by sheer imperviousness to reason. I surrender the thread to you, and let our posts speak for themselves to any future reader to decide.
I'm happy to let our posts speak for themselves, and for any future reader to decide who has been reasonable.