Sounds like force to me.
Sounds like gun grabbing to me.
No one is grabbing your guns; they are simply saying that you should take yourself and/or weapons elsewhere than upon private property where they are not welcome.
Would you feel better with this for a solution: posted at the gate is a sign that says "Anyone who brings unauthorized weapons on this property will be considered an armed intruder, and shot on sight." Then, when he exercises HIS 2nd amendment rights in defense of HIS property rights, you would realize that YOUR 2nd amendment rights don't trump them because you say so.
Contracts between two people that contravene constitutional rights are not enforceable. -- Re-read the article.
Any way you slice it, one side or the other in any court decision has to abide by a Governmentally [constitutionally] imposed ruling against what they see as their own interests. The other side has the coercive power of that decision backing their interests.
Quite true. You don't agree with the way our rule of constitutional law works? -- Do business elsewhere.
You are obdurate in your inconsistency. Why is it you believe the 2nd amendment takes precedence over the 1st, 3rd, 4th, and 5th?
I don't believe that. -- You seem to believe/demand that your right to parking lot property takes precedence over our right to carry arms in vehicles. -- That's inconsistent with our Constitutional principles.
Why are you against the free exercise of so many sections of the Constitution?
Why are you against the free exercise of 2nd amendment section of the Constitution?
Our gov't has the duty to enforce the Constitution against infringements of our right to carry arms.
Sounds like force to me.
Sounds like gun grabbing to me.
No one is grabbing your guns; they are simply saying that you should take yourself and/or weapons elsewhere than upon private property where they are not welcome.
Why do you insist that arms are not welcome in an employees vehicle?
Would you feel better with this for a solution: posted at the gate is a sign that says "Anyone who brings unauthorized weapons on this property will be considered an armed intruder, and shot on sight." Then, when he exercises HIS 2nd amendment rights in defense of HIS property rights, you would realize that YOUR 2nd amendment rights don't trump them because you say so.
You want employers to post on their parking lots -- "Anyone who brings unauthorized weapons on this property will be considered an armed intruder --"? That's your solution? -- Thanks.