What you provided does not uniquely support heliocentrism and you would be completely dishonest to imply that they do.
Your arguments are completely based on geometry and Ernst Mach proved that the laws of geometry would be violated if there were any essential difference between a heliocentric and a geocentric model back in the 1800's.
Now, where was your unique evidence supporting only heliocentrism? Can't be geometric. Ernst Mach proved that.
!?
What do you think "heliocentric" means, exactly?
This comment is so wrong as to be non-sensical . . .
Do you observe the motion of the planets and moon?