Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dominic Harr

What you provided does not uniquely support heliocentrism and you would be completely dishonest to imply that they do.

Your arguments are completely based on geometry and Ernst Mach proved that the laws of geometry would be violated if there were any essential difference between a heliocentric and a geocentric model back in the 1800's.

Now, where was your unique evidence supporting only heliocentrism? Can't be geometric. Ernst Mach proved that.


283 posted on 03/15/2007 3:40:51 PM PDT by GourmetDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies ]


To: GourmetDan
Your arguments are completely based on geometry and Ernst Mach proved that the laws of geometry would be violated if there were any essential difference between a heliocentric and a geocentric model back in the 1800's.

!?

What do you think "heliocentric" means, exactly?

This comment is so wrong as to be non-sensical . . .

284 posted on 03/15/2007 3:44:18 PM PDT by Dominic Harr (Conservative: The "ant", to a liberal's "grasshopper".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies ]

To: GourmetDan
Oh, and you *still* didn't comment on my evidence.

Do you observe the motion of the planets and moon?

286 posted on 03/15/2007 3:52:05 PM PDT by Dominic Harr (Conservative: The "ant", to a liberal's "grasshopper".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson