Did you read the Cunningham court documents? Did you evaluate the donations received by Hunter over the years?
It doesn't take a moonbat site to do that, it takes objectivism. You don't have it.
I've read a fair number. None have shown any indication of wrongdoing by Hunter.
Did you evaluate the donations received by Hunter over the years?
Yep. I also noticed that Bush received a lot of money from one of the perps in question. And the RNC. But for some reason you aren't addressing that.
Of course, donations do not equal graft, unless you are the likes of McCain. Or you, apparently.
It doesn't take a moonbat site to do that, it takes objectivism. You don't have it.
That's pathetic - YOU lecturing ANYONE about objectivity when it comes to this subject.
Have you? It is interesting to note that the smear-by-association tactics don't actually work here. Rather than sell out his principles, whether you understand those principles or not, he rebuffed campaign contributors and stuck to his guns.
It doesn't take a moonbat site to do that, it takes objectivism.
Actually, it takes a studious and rigorous academic approach, which fairly explores the pros and cons and seeks to establish truth. Not a hit-and-run smear atack. Which clearly lacks what you are now espousing..."objectivism" [sic] did you mean objectivity?