The other day the WP ran an article about how difficult it is for someone from the House to become President. Historically, it is very rare indeed. I often wonder what the hideen political agenda is that spawns these articles. Sort of like the articles that came out during the Clinton-Monica scandal, i.e., everybody lies about sex and sometimes lying is a good thing so as not to offend someone. The MSM would like to narrow our choices to who they think are viable.
I hope you are right. It just seems like there have been some criteria that had to be met in some past debates. Things like having to get a certain percentage in the polls.
For example, I know in the past that Alan Keyes has been excluded. Now I have no problem realizing that he was not ever going to win the nomination, but I did think he had some interesting things to say and would have added to the debates. (Of course I LOVE debates)
Can't wait untill they get underway.