And how many Constitutional absolutionists have we ever seen in the Presidency?
Would that action by Reagan have been enough for you to vote for Carter? If your answer is "yes" you are to be pitied.
None. So why expect to nominate one in 2008? Why complain if Guiliani is not also one?
Would that action by Reagan have been enough for you to vote for Carter? If your answer is "yes" you are to be pitied.
And even more, if Guiliani saying that he supports "reasonable restrictions" causes you also to throw a fit, you are to be pitied as well.