Wow. That's an impressive concentration of ignorance packed into a couple short sentences: Effectively an announcement, that; "Now I'm going to debunk an entire subject I thoroughly misunderstand and know virtually nothing about"!
Where to start? First apes evolved from monkeys (or monkey-like ancestors) not monkeys from apes, so you have that completely backwards.
Second monkeys and apes are vastly more distinct from each other by nearly every objective measure -- gross anatomy, genetic distance, geologic time separating first appearances in the fossil record; excepting, of course, only the uniquely extreme development of the neocortex in humans -- than humans are from apes. Therefore if you object to the notion that humans and apes are related by evolution, you logically ought also to object to the notion that monkeys and apes are so related. In fact the fossil evidence of early apes is actually worse, relatively speaking, than that of early humans.