A couple of thoughts. First in a few weeks this will be a subject for a "Law and Order "show, where we will see how badly these poor misunderstood Imams were treated and how those awful airlines profiled them and of course they will win the suit on TV for Millions.
My next thought is that any decent court would see this case for what it is, and refuse to even hear it.
Unfortunately, the facts, as alleged by the Imam's are not the subject of "Summary Judgement" or "Motion to Dismiss". The facts create an issue of fact which can only be resolved by the finder of fact - a jury or judge as the case may be.
"My next thought is that any decent court would see this case for what it is, and refuse to even hear it" I agree witht this completely, but it will be the jury or finder of fact who is allowed the privilege of ignoring the Imam's case. So, while the facts don't preclude a trial the end result is still the equivalent of "refuse to even here it".