Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Justa

>>Get with the program would ya?

The Global Warming Sham documentary puts the lie to the Greenhouse effect, not global warming. It accurately points out that changes in global temperatures occur before changes in CO2 levels. IOW, CO2 changes follow temperature changes rather than causing them. I.e. saying humans' CO2 contributions are the cause of global warming is a lie.<<

It did not appear to do that. Not to mention CO2 does correlate with warming through most of the last 600,000 years - what is not proved is that CO2 causes the warming.

I agree that was a well produced rebuttal to Al Gore but it was not, unfortunately, an accurate or honest rebuttal.

Some of the groups that agree CO2 correlates with global warming:

NASA
NOAA
NSF
American Astronomical Society
American Geophysical Union
Geological Society of America
American Meteorological Society

None of them agree with your statement that "CO2 changes follow temperature changes"


133 posted on 03/12/2007 4:42:10 PM PDT by gondramB (It wasn't raining when Noah built the ark.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]


To: gondramB
None of them agree with your statement that "CO2 changes follow temperature changes"

Heh, stick around.

140 posted on 03/12/2007 4:50:36 PM PDT by Justa (Politically Correct is morally wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

To: gondramB
Some of the groups that agree CO2 correlates with global warming:

I think your faith in anything that smacks of technology or science is well meaning but you are going to be disillusioned in due course. First of all, "groups" do not agree or disagree, and even if they do it is a policy decision not a scientific one. Secondly, the people who make up these groups you trust so deeply are human beings who have their jobs and careers to protect and advance. If you have been following this issue as closely as you seem to be, you are well aware that already, for a reputable scientist to publish good solid data which leads to skepticism, is to risk killing his career.

This is a political issue, not a scientific one, as the Czech president said last week. Sad--but reality, so deal with it. Science is playing a distant second fiddle right now, and will be until the debunkers marshall overwhelming proof and the GW enthusiasts' predictions continue to fall flat.(In case you missed it, the IPCC's first round of predictions failed completely--that's why they came up with new ones!) In the meantime be of good cheer-- the world is not going to fry or drown.

159 posted on 03/12/2007 5:07:28 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson